Laserfiche WebLink
wanted to just sweep the facts under the table and substitute a Bench one material and although we <br />had up to 5 o6 feet of prime soil, they wanted to put back just 22 inches on the same property, the <br />Sunshine Corner, that they are now wanting to put into DRYLAND. <br />DRMS and WFC blamed Jim Irvine for the mistake and Ross said that he documented that if the PH <br />was higher than 7.4, then it was not prime, therefore they did not address it as prime. I told Michael <br />that they were all Tieing and that Ross knew it was prime and so did lance and so did the Division, <br />so I began tracking down Jim Irvine because I knew a Certified Soil Scientist was not going to <br />document such a thing. After many weeks, although I did not talk with Mr. Irvine, I did speak with <br />his partner and was told that the soil survey indicated it was prime. So, back to the courthouse I went <br />and pulled up the soil survey and low and behold, Jim Irvine did document it as being prime and <br />WFC and the Division violated all of the rules and regulations that were put out by the state. Article <br />33 guarantees that this won't happen and it did. READ THE DOCUMENT. <br />Here is another indication of discrimination By WFC and the Division. Mr. Morgan is blind and he <br />went to the court house to get a copy of one of the revisions and they said to call WFC and WFC said <br />NO. I called Sandy Brown at the Division and she said No we couldn't copy down here, but they <br />could send us a copy if we wanted to pay the copy price and the shipping which was $50. Now, this <br />is a revision that concerns the Morgan property greatly. Now, I'll read you THEIR laws 2.04.8 <br />which states specifically the documents are at the court house for public inspection and COPYING <br />AT THE COURT house. <br />One of the Major concerns of ours is a letter written by Dean Stindt from NRCS and the Department <br />of Agriculture. The Mine has used this documentation in 23 different applications at the court house <br />• and so has the Division. This document has been used involving the Benson place, Dirk Richards <br />place, the Garveys, Burbridge, Mel Staats, Johnsons, Lloyds, and Morgan properties. This letter has <br />been used inappropriately and against all of the Divisions rules and regulations. READ and SHOW <br />MAP. This letter has been used against the MORGANS. <br />We do not feel that the Division reads or listens to anything we write or say. We do not believe that <br />they have read the permit-revision to it's fullest and are not really involved in what is happening here <br />and I'll prove this now. READ DIRECTORS letter. <br />Marcia Talvitie has made numerous documentations in the last 6 months containing reference to <br />NRCS letters and Dean Strindts that are used for areas that the letters weren't meant to be used for. <br />Marcia Talvitie also made statements such as Irrigated Haylands are not cropland. That is a total <br />contradiction of your laws. Any HAY LANDS are crop lands whether they are grass, oats. Or <br />alfalfa. If they are raising hay, they are crops, and considered cropland by your definition. <br />There are Alluvials on property that is being mined and those should have been treated as a top <br />priority. (Documented in Jim Irvines class 1 soil survey) <br />Jim Boyds documentation of 98E and 98A were very small, small areas and then they used the <br />documentation to include all of Lloyds and Bensons instead of just the very tiny pieces that Jim Boyd <br />0 meant the letter to pretain to.