Laserfiche WebLink
4.4 SPECIES COMPOSITION <br />• The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety considers species composition of <br />the revegetated and reclaimed areas to be an indicator of successful vegetation establishment <br />and a diverse vegetation community. The species composition standard requires that there be <br />at least four perennial species, of which three are warm season grasses and one a cool season <br />grass. No one component of the above four species should comprise greater than 40% <br />relative importance nor less than 3% relative importance. Relative importance will be <br />measured by calculating relative cover of the revegetation species. Vegetation species which <br />may be used in the calculation of species composition may be any plant species not defined <br />as a noxious or prohibited plant species, and may be native or introduced. <br />A comparison of the 2007 species composition data with the revegetation success standard <br />reveals that in the 2002 reclamation areas three warm season grass species and one cool <br />season grass were lacking adequate relative cover to be counted for the species composition <br />criterion. This year, two warm season grasses and one cool season grass species were lacking <br />in sufficient relative cover to satisfy the criterion. <br />The 2006 reclamation area exceeded the number of qualifying cool season grass species (2), <br />but lacked two qualifying warm season grasses. Several warm season grass species were <br />present in the sampling, providing promise for this relatively young, developing area. <br />4.5 COMPARISON OF VEGETATION COMMUNITY TRENDS <br />• Direct comparison of the 2009 monitoring data for the areas sampled with that of previous <br />years to evaluate long-term trends in vegetation communities cannot be undertaken for the <br />2002 and 2006 reclamation areas as they have only been monitored from one to three years. <br />The short duration of sampling precludes any significant observations regarding long-term <br />trends at this time. <br />5.0 SUMMARY <br />Quantitative monitoring of the 2002 and 2006 reclamation areas revealed that the all <br />reclamation areas met the requirements for final revegetation success for total vegetation <br />cover and total herbaceous production. Of the revegetated areas sampled in 2009, neither the <br />2002 or 2006 reclamation areas met the species composition revegetation success criterion. <br />Table 1 reveals that the total number of species encountered during sampling is significant <br />and diverse in numbers of species, lifeforms, and seasonal variety. <br />The 2002 reclamation areas revealed a significant annual forb component this growing <br />season. While desirable perennial grasses were present in the quantitative cover sampling, <br />their relative cover was below that expected from prior revegetation efforts and adjacent <br />reclamation areas at the Keenesburg Mine. <br />• The 2006 reclamation area has shown significant development of a diverse, effective, <br />permanent vegetation cover, and is expected to continue in their successful development. <br />Coors Energy Company Keenesburg Mine Page 15 <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report