My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-25_REPORT - C1981028 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-02-25_REPORT - C1981028 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:00:07 PM
Creation date
2/26/2010 8:40:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/25/2010
Doc Name
2009 Annual Hydrology and Annual Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2009
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2006 reclamation area, ten were native and six were introduced. Perennial species <br />outnumbered annual species by nine to six, with one biennial species. Cool season species <br />is were slightly more prevalent than warm season species (nine cool season to seven warm <br />season) this year. Warm season graminoids were represented by five species and cool <br />season graminoids included four species. Five forb species were identified as cool season <br />and two were warm season. <br />The 2006 reclamation area had five species contributing greater than three percent relative <br />cover this year. These species included Oryzopsis hymenoides (66.09%), Bromus tectorum <br />(9.28%), Agropyron trachycaulum (6.38%), Calamovilfa longifolia (4.35%), and Mehlotus <br />officinalis (4.06%). <br />3.2 1998,1999, 2000, AND 2003 RECLAMATION AREAS <br />In 2009, the 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2003 reclamation areas were quantitatively sampled for <br />vegetation cover, total herbaceous production, and species composition. The results and <br />discussion of that sampling is contained in companion reports to be submitted with the future <br />bond release requests. <br />3.3 COMPARISON OF RECLAMATION AREAS WITH FINAL REVEGETATION <br />SUCCESS CRITERIA <br />Monitoring of the revegetated areas allows for the identification of vegetation community <br />development trends during the extended liability period. This evaluation also assists in <br />• decisions regarding yearly grazing, husbandry practices, interseeding, fertilizing, and weed <br />management. Comparison of the reclaimed area values for vegetation cover, herbaceous <br />production, and species composition with the final revegetation success criteria, indicates <br />whether revegetation has been successful, or whether additional measures need to be initiated <br />to enhance vegetation community development. The tables below allow the comparison of <br />the parameter values with the standard to be achieved, either from the predictive equations in <br />the case of vegetation cover (y=0.0173x3-0.8592x2+14.562x-47.015) and herbaceous <br />production (v=0.3749x2.2485), or the established standard for species composition. <br />Total Vegetation Cover (2009) <br />Predictive Equation Value for 2009: 35.69 % total vegetation cover <br />2002 Reclamation 2006 Reclamation <br />Areas Area <br />Xbar 61.20 53.20 <br />S 13.34 8.50 <br />N 10 10 <br />Nmin 16 9 <br />Based on the results of the 2009 quantitative sampling, the 2002 and 2006 reclamation areas <br />exceeded the predicted total cover vegetation value of 35.69 percent, meeting the final <br />• revegetation success criterion for vegetation cover. <br />Coors Energy Company Keenesburg Mine Page 11 <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.