My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-25_REPORT - C1981028 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-02-25_REPORT - C1981028 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:00:07 PM
Creation date
2/26/2010 8:40:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/25/2010
Doc Name
2009 Annual Hydrology and Annual Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2009
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.3 Herbaceous Production <br />• Herbaceous production was estimated by the harvest method. One herbaceous production <br />plot was located and randomly oriented at the origin of each cover transect. Additional <br />production plots were randomly located. Herbaceous production plots were 0.50 square <br />meters in area. All current year above ground live herbaceous plant biomass was clipped <br />within the 0.50 square meter quadrat. Production material was air dried until weights varied <br />by no more than 0.1 g. <br />2.2.4 Species Composition <br />Species composition information was derived from quantitative vegetation cover data. <br />Relative cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance of each <br />encountered plant species and lifeform and for comparison to the final revegetation success <br />criterion. The tables presenting data summaries for total vegetation cover for each area <br />sampled also contain the relative cover by species, and a column depicting the numerical <br />ranking of each species by relative cover within the area. <br />2.3 SAMPLE NUMBERS/SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />For the purposes of vegetation monitoring at the Keenesburg Mine, set numbers of samples <br />were established for the parameters to be sampled by Savage and Savage and Coors Energy <br />Company. The number of samples taken for each reclamation year was consistent with <br />numbers agreed to in the past by CDRMS. In each revegetated area, the size and number of <br />• parcels dictated the total number of samples taken, as described above. <br />Since the purpose of this sampling was the monitoring of the vegetative condition at the <br />revegetated areas of the mine, sampling need not meet sample adequacy requirements. <br />Minimum sample sizes and standard deviation are reported as an indication of variability of <br />the sampled parameters. Comparisons between sample mean parameter values assume that <br />the sample mean value accurately represents the population mean in all cases. <br />2.4 SPECIES IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION <br />Species identification was accomplished in the field through the use of plant identification <br />keys (Harrington, 1954, Weber, 1990; Whitson, 1987; Zimdahl, 1990, Stubbendieck, et al, <br />1995). In cases where plant identification was inconclusive in the field, voucher specimens <br />were pressed for lab identification. <br />3.0 RESULTS <br />3.1 QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION: RECLAMATION AREAS <br />3.1.1 2002 RECLAMATION AREAS <br />• The 2002 reclamation areas encompass just over 13 acres of reclamation in two distinct <br />parcels within the Keenesburg Mine permit area. The areas include Area 23, a small area <br />Coors Energy Company KeenerWrg Mine Page 8 <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.