Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 of 2 <br />In order to expedite the review of PR-10 for Bowie No. 2, 1 thought I would e-mail one question to you now for <br />clarification. <br />I was under the impression that Bowie was going to state under Rule 2.05.6(6) that material damage to the Terror <br />Creek Reservoir could occur due to mine induced seismicty affecting the landslide adjacent to the reservoir. I <br />thought that this statement would be made as a consequence of concerns from Jason Ward concerning the <br />landslide stability issue. With the possibility of material damage causing interruption or diminution of use of the <br />reservoir, Rule 2.04.7(3) would require an alternate supply of water. <br />An alternate water supply is described on revised page 2.05-116 of the May 12, 2008 submittal. However, on <br />revised page 2.05-106 of the same submittal, it is stated that the landslide will not be affected by mine induced <br />seismicity. <br />Could you please explain Bowie's position and is it in agreement with Jason Ward's position? <br />6/12/2008