My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981044A
>
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:55 PM
Creation date
2/23/2010 10:58:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/25/2010
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
observed in the permit area. However, the potential exists for the following rare and endangered species to be found <br />within the permit area; golden and bald EC, greater sandhill crane, pergrine falcon, and black footed ferret. In <br />addition, the potential exists for the Colorado squawfish to inhabit sections of the Yampa and Williams Fork rivers. <br />However, no Colorado squawfish were observed during the quarterly fish and benthic organism survey that was <br />conducted in selected sections of the Williams Fork River for a period of two and one-half years. <br />EC has made a commitment to report all sightings of rare and endangered species to the CMLRD. The report will <br />include species identification, date, and location. The following sightings of rare and endangered species have been <br />noted by EC personnel: greater sandhill crane, golden eagle, and immature golden or bald eagles. All sightings have <br />been reported to the CMLRD and OSM. <br />To further protect raptors, EC employs araptor-proof design on all newly constructed power poles. Atypical raptor- <br />proof design is presented in Figure 58, Typical Raptor-Proof Power Pole Diagram. <br />EC conducted a fish and benthic organism survey in the Williams Fork River near the coal storage silo for 2.5 years. <br />As a permit stipulation, the survey was to be conducted for five-(5) years. However, the stipulation was removed in <br />August 1982, after EC provided a statistical demonstration that [he mining operation was not impacting the biota of <br />the Williams Fork River. <br />Protection of Hvdroloeic Balance <br />Ponds, Ditches and Diversions. EC has a drainage and sediment control plan in place, which controls all water, <br />which moves into, through, and out of the permit area. The drainage and sediment control plan is shown graphically <br />on the Drainage and Sediment Control Map (Map 26). The drainage and sediment control system consists of <br />sediment ponds, ditches, culverts, and a bridge over the Williams Fork River. In addition to these stmctures, the <br />Drainage and Sediment Control Map (Map 26) shows the locations of the fresh water systems and the mine water <br />handling system and associated ponds. <br />The Drainage and Sediment Control Map (Map 26) also shows several small disturbed areas that are not included <br />within the sediment control system. EC requests small area exemption (SAE) variance in accordance with Rule <br />4.05.2 (3) for these areas. Details regarding these SAE's are given in Exhibit 18. EC will maintain containment <br />berms, vegetative cover, and grass filters, as required by the designs shown in Exhibit 18. <br />Design methodologies and calculations for all drainage and sediment control structures have been included in Exhibit <br />18, Drainage and Sediment Control Plan. All engineering designs were performed by a qualified, registered <br />professional engineer. <br />Hvdroloeic Collection, Recording, and Reporting Plan <br />The plan for collecting, recording, and reporting of hydrologic data is presented in Exhibit 29, Water Quality <br />Monitoring Manual - EC. An annual hydrologic report will be submitted by March 30, for the previous calendar <br />year. Data submitted will include piezometric maps, statement concerning observed inflows from the floor in the <br />active sections during the preceding year, plots of water levels, and appropriate water quality trends. <br />PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />Mine Inflows <br />Past and Present Inflows. A plot of the quarterly discharge for the No. 5 Mine discharge point in presented in Figure <br />21, in Section 2.04.7, Hydrology Information for [he period 1982 through 1992 along with the 7 North Angle <br />discharge starting in 1989. These discharge points include inflows to both the No. 5 and No. 6 mines, which are <br />Permit Revision 04-34 2.05-36 Revised 7/2/04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.