My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981044A
>
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:55 PM
Creation date
2/23/2010 10:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/25/2010
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Information on Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lithologies. <br />Ground water flow in [he regional area should conform generally [o the structure as shown on the maps and cross <br />sections presented in this permit. <br />TOPOGRAPHIC SETTINGS <br />The EC mine site and adjacent area lie at the foot of the prominent Williams Fork Mountains, which trend east to <br />west immediately to the south. North of [he Williams Fork Mountains, a gradual, north sloping surface runs down <br />through the broad Big Bottom Valley of the southward flowing Yampa River. West of the Williams Fork Mountains <br />the Williams Fork River flows northward in a narrow valley to ajunc[ion with the Yampa River at the southern end of <br />Big Bottom. A northwestward trending ridge situated west of Big Bottom and the Williams Fork Valley is cut by [he <br />Yampa River, forming a narrow, fairly steep walled canyon. Just west of this ridge, the Yampa River flows through <br />Round Bottom. <br />REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL SETTING <br />The EC Permit area is situated between two regional geologic features, 1) the Axial Basin Arch (anticline) and 2) <br />Sand Wash Basin, which lie to the southwest and northeast respectively. The regional geologic setting is presented <br />graphically on the Regional Geology and Hydrologic Monitoring Program Location Map (Map 11). The EC Mine <br />site is located on three (3) smaller structures, these are 1) the Williams Fork anticline, 2) the Round Bottom syncline, <br />and 3) Big Bottom syncline, which are superimposed on the northeastern limb of the axial basin arch. Major faults are <br />known to exist just north of these anticlinal and synclinal swctures. The trend of most of the geologic structures in <br />the area is to the northwest. Regional dips through the area are generally northward at 7 to 10 degrees. <br />The bedrock units exposed in the permit area are predominantly cretaceous in age and include from oldest to youngest <br />the Mancos Shale, the Iles and Williams Fork formations of the Mesa Verde group, and the Lewis Shale. The major <br />surficial geologic unit of the vicinity is alluvium along the course of the Yampa River and its tributaries. <br />GENERAL HYDROLOGY <br />Ground Water <br />Ground water occurs at the EC Mine site in bedrock aquifers and in the alluvium. The bedrock aquifers include <br />sandstones and fractured coals in the Iles and Williams Fork formations. Less significant shale aquifers are found in <br />the Mancos and Lewis Shales. The Yampa and Williams Fork River alluviums appear to be saturated. However, the <br />permeabilities and water yields are so low in the vicinity of the EC Mine [hat these alluviums cannot be considered <br />significant aquifers. <br />Well yields in the bedrock aquifers near the mine site are generally low. The aquifers appear to have low primary <br />permeability, but locally they can have high permeabilities. These locally high permeability zones appear to be <br />secondary permeabilities produced by fracturing. Well yields are generally less than 25 gallons per minute (GPM). A <br />few high yield test holes with yields up to 200 gpm have been encountered. <br />The permeability and yield of the alluvium near the mine site are very low. Test wells in the Yampa and Williams <br />Fork alluvium all had yields of less than three (3) gpm and most had yields of less than one (1) gpm. Higher well <br />yields for [he Yampa River alluvium have been reported in other areas. Well yields as high as 900 gpm have been <br />reported for wells drilled east of Craig, Colorado. <br />The direction of flow of ground water in the bedrock aquifers appears to be in a southwesterly to northwesterly <br />direction. The general direction of flow may be locally altered by outcrops, producing wells, or mine dewatering. <br />Permit Revision 04-34 2.04-3 Revised 7/2/04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.