2009-08-13_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (4)

Home Browse Search

RULE 2 PERMITS • Potential Impacts to Bedrock Groundwater Quantity No impacts are anticipated to the quantity of groundwater in the Williams Fork Formation or the Trout Creek Sandstone of the Iles Formation. Drilling and mining by Colowyo in the area identified very limited perched water, and no saturated conditions, in the Williams Fork Formation. In the Williams Fork Formation, the low permeability and depositional nature of the strata restrict the ability of the bedrock to store and transmit water. There are no continuous non-coal beds in the Danforth Hills. Groundwater movement is mainly controlled by fractures of varying orientation. The Williams Fork Formation is not a significant water supply source in the Danforth Hills. It is not used as a source of water where the alluvial and surface waters aze accessible. Where wells yield water, the water quality in the Williams Fork Formation is generally good. Very few registered wells for domestic, agricultural, or industrial purposes are completed in the Williams Fork Formation in the vicinity of the South Taylor pit. Drilling by Colowyo and other parties encountered no significant water in the South Taylor pit azea in the litholgic sequence which is planned to mined. This is based on the drilling and geophysical logs. It should be noted that the current East and West Pits at the Colowyo Mine do not intersect any significant aquifers. Perched aquifers have been encountered which drain rapidly. Once drained, they do not produce any significant water to the current pits. Since the South Taylor pit is higher in elevation than the two current pits, and also up dip of the current pits, no significant aquifers should be encountered in this pit. The Trout Creek Sandstone aquifer is sepazated from the lowest coal seam (G8) to be mined by approximately 590 feet in the South Taylor pit azea. Between this coal seam and the Trout Creek • Sandstone is a mudstone/shale, sandstone, siltstone, and coal sequence of the Williams Fork Formation. About 165 feet above the Trout Creek Sandstone, atwo-foot thick smectite clay layer (known as the Krrt bed) exists that is found throughout the Danforth Hills area. This layer has low permeability and therefore would be an additional impediment to downwazd or upward groundwater flow. To determine the potential for the operations to encounter substantial groundwater and thus to require dewatering, elevations of groundwater and the depth of the pits were compazed. The elevation of the potentiometric surface in well 84-0-OB was 7,054 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in October 1984 (CDM 1985a). This well was completed in the sandstone in the above the I3 seam of the Williams Fork Formation (as correlated by Colowyo). The lowest projected depth of the South Taylor pit is approximately 7,320 feet AMSL. The Trout Creek Sandstone aquifer has a potentiometric elevation of between 7,050 and 7,100 feet AMSL beneath the South Taylor mining azea (CDM, 1985a). This indicates that the pit bottom is above the saturated bedrock. Since the base of the pit will be above the elevations of the potentiometric surfaces in bedrock and alluvial aquifers, no impacts to the quantity of groundwater available in the Williams Fork Formation or the Trout Creek Sandstone aze anticipated. u South TaylodLower Wilson- Rule 2, Page 112 Revision Date: 3/30/07 Revision No.: PR-02