My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (55)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (55)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 5:56:16 AM
Creation date
2/22/2010 10:24:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
2/11/2010
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> General Comments <br /> This was a monthly DRMS partial inspection, combined with a site visit by Duane Matt and Christy Hulsman of <br /> the OSM Denver Office. Mr. Matt and Ms. Hulsman were on site to make observations pertinent to a national <br /> OSM effort to assess conformance with Approximate Original Contour(AOC)regulatory requirements. Yoast <br /> was one of several Colorado mines selected for the evaluation. OSM engineering staff had reviewed relevant <br /> permit documentation and maps in the Denver DRMS office prior to the field verification visit. <br /> Weather was cloudy and cold, with occasional light snow flurries. Deep snow in almost all areas made <br /> observations difficult, and access was limited to the lower portions of the PM-12, PM-13, and PM-14 watersheds <br /> located adjacent to the Sage Creek county road, along the western perimeter of the reclaimed area. A portion <br /> of the PM-12 watershed was walked during the inspection, while observations of the PM-13 and PM-14 <br /> watersheds were made from the road, due to deeply drifted snow and exhaustion from hiking through drifts in <br /> the Pond 12 watershed. The main access road into Yoast from 20 Mile Road has not been maintained through <br /> the winter and is impassable due to deep snow. <br /> Backfill and Grading <br /> Lower portions of the Pond 12 watershed were inspected/observed by hiking up to and along the top of the <br /> ridge northeast of Pond 12, along the crest of the slide zone and around the east end of Topsoil Stockpile"U. <br /> South facing reclaimed highwall slopes were traversed as far east as Channel PM-7. Lower slopes and <br /> segments of Channels PM 6-2 and PM 6-3 were walked on the return back to the vehicle, parked on the Sage <br /> Creek Road west of the Pond 12 embankment. Snow cover ranged from 1'to over 4' deep, with the exception <br /> of steep south exposures in the immediate vicinity of the Pond 12 slide zone and some locations along the <br /> upper perimeter of the south facing reclaimed highwall slope. Two inclinometer slope readings were taken <br /> during the walk-about. One slope measurement was taken along what appeared to be typical reclaimed <br /> highwall slope, approximately 100 yards southeast of Topsoil Stockpile"U, in the PM 6-2 watershed; slope was <br /> 36%. The second measurement was a profile along a segment of Channel PM-7, immediately downstream of <br /> the culverted temporary road crossing; slope measured was 30%. From comparison of PMT Map Exhibit 20-2 <br /> and Channel Profiles Exhibit 20-213, the channel slope measurement appears to have been made along a <br /> channel segment with a design slope range of 27.6% to 35.3%. <br /> Several piezometers and exploratory trenches were observed in the vicinity of the Pond 12 slide. These are <br /> associated with sub-surface geologic and hydrologic investigations undertaken to allow for development of a <br /> slide remediation plan, which was submitted to the Division on February 16, 2010. <br /> The areas of the Pond 12 watershed that were walked and measured during this inspection will not be included <br /> in the Division's pending Phase 1 bond release approval proposed decision, due to the extent of remaining slide <br /> repair, road removal, drainage stabilization, and final grading work. Refer to the Division's SLA inspection <br /> issued 10/13/09 for details. <br /> Hydrologic Balance <br /> Ponds 12, 12A, 13, and 14 were observed. All ponds were iced over and snow covered, and no problems were <br /> noted. Pond 12 was discharging clear flow due to inflow from spoil spring discharge. Ponds 12A, 13 and 14 did <br /> not appear to be discharging. <br /> There was no activity evident and no problems were noted that have not been addressed in previous <br /> inspections. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.