My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
2/19/2010 2:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/19/2010
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
Savage & Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to thirteen, with one biennial. Both warm and cool season species contributed to the <br />seasonality of the 1998, 1999, and 2000 reclamation areas. Warm season graminoids <br />outnumbered cool season graminoids by ten to eight. Cool season forbs prevailed by thirteen <br />to three. The succulent was evergreen and the shrub was deciduous. <br />The 1998, 1999, and 2000 reclamation areas had nine species contributing greater than three <br />percent relative cover this year. The species contributing greater than three percent relative <br />cover included four warm season perennial grasses, one cool season perennial grass, one <br />annual grass, one perennial forb, and two annual forbs. These species included Calamovilfa <br />longifolia (31.17 percent relative cover), Bromus tectorum (11.84 %), Ambrosia psilostachya <br />(8.04%), Helianthus annuus (7.48% relative cover), Panicum virgatum (7.12%), Agropyron <br />smithii (6.56%), Kochia scoparia (4.91%), Bouteloua gracilis (4.29%), and Andropogon <br />hallii (4.05%). <br />3.2 COMPARISON OF RECLAMATION AREAS WITH FINAL REVEGETATION <br />SUCCESS CRITERIA <br />Comparison of the reclaimed area values for vegetation cover, herbaceous production, and <br />species composition with the final revegetation success criteria, indicates whether <br />revegetation has been successful, or whether additional measures need to be initiated to <br />enhance vegetation community development. The tables below allow the comparison of the <br />parameter values with the standard to be achieved, either from the predictive equations in the <br />case of total vegetation cover (y=0.0173x3-0.8592X2+ 14.562x-47.015) and total herbaceous <br />production (y=0.3749x2.248 ), or the established standard for species composition. <br />Total Vegetation Cover (2009) <br />The predictive equation value for total vegetation cover for 2009 (based on 13.71" <br />precipitation value): 35.69% <br />Parameter Value I 1998/1999/2000 Rec. Areas <br />mbar 60.96% <br />S 7.41 <br />N 46 <br />Nmin 3 <br />Based on the results of the 2009 quantitative sampling, the 1998, 1999, and 2000 reclamation <br />areas exceeded the predicted total cover vegetation value of 35.69 percent, meeting the final <br />revegetation success criterion for total vegetation cover. <br />Coors Energy Company Keenesburg Mine <br />Page 1 O <br />Areas 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 19 Vegetation Study (2009)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.