My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
2/19/2010 2:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/19/2010
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
Savage & Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.3 Herbaceous Production <br />Herbaceous production was estimated by the harvest method. One herbaceous production <br />plot was located and randomly oriented at the origin of each cover transect. Additional <br />production plots were randomly located. Herbaceous production plots were 0.50 square <br />meters in area. All current year above ground live herbaceous plant biomass was clipped <br />within the 0.50 square meter quadrat. Production material was air dried until weights varied <br />by no more than 0.1 g. <br />2.2.4 Species Composition <br />Species composition information was derived from quantitative vegetation cover data. <br />Relative cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance of each <br />encountered plant species and lifeform and for comparison to the final revegetation success <br />criterion. The tables presenting data summaries for total vegetation cover for each area <br />sampled also contain the relative cover by species, and a column depicting the numerical <br />ranking of each species by relative cover within the area. <br />2.3 SAMPLE NUMBERS/SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />For the purposes of this study, total vegetation cover and total herbaceous production <br />sampling were undertaken to sample adequacy for each sampling unit with a minimum of <br />fifteen (15) samples. Parameter testing occurred at the one-sided 90% confidence level. <br />Comparisons between sample mean parameter values and the revegetation success standard <br />assume that the sample mean value accurately represents the population mean in all cases. <br />The following formula was used for sample adequacy calculations: <br />(t)2 (s)2 <br />min - ---------------- <br />(d Xbar)2 <br />where: nmin = minimum sample size <br />s = sample standard deviation <br />t = the Student's t distribution value at the 90% level (one-sided) <br />d = percent acceptable deviation from the mean (10%) <br />Xbar = sample mean <br />2.4 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS <br />Statistical analysis for the revegetation success criterion of total vegetation cover is required <br />if the value of the sample mean from the reclaimed area is less than 90 percent of the value of <br />the final revegetation success criteria for total vegetation cover or total herbaceous <br />production. <br />Sampling revealed that the mean total vegetation cover for the 1998, 1999, and 2000 <br />reclamation area sampling units was greater than that of the final revegetation cover success <br />standard value, therefore no statistical analysis was required. Similarly, total herbaceous <br />Coors Energy Company KeeneSburg Mine Page 7 <br />Areas 2, 5, 6, 7, 9,10, 15, 16, and 19 Vegetation Study (2009)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.