My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-02-19_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
2/19/2010 2:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/19/2010
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
Savage & Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 METHODS <br />2.1 SAMPLING DESIGN <br />• <br />Discussions with revegetation specialists at CDRMS in February 2007 and April 2009 <br />formalized the sampling design for vegetation sampling at the Keenesburg Mine. Areas <br />revegetated in 1998, 1999, and 2000 would be treated as one sampling unit as parcels within <br />the revegetation areas and revegetation years were contiguous (or nearly so) and received the <br />same seed mixes and reclamation management. <br />Prior to initiation of fieldwork, the permit document and applicable maps were reviewed to <br />evaluate topography, reclamation timing, seed mixes, revegetation methods, management, <br />and applicable revegetation standards. <br />A map of the mine site at 1:2400 scale (1 "=200') was used to delineate the revegetated areas <br />(Coors Site Plan; Vegetation Sampling Locations). On a gridded overlay of the revegetation <br />map, a Cartesian coordinate grid (50x50 feet) was established. Computer generated random <br />numbers were used to establish a pool of x,y coordinates. The acreage of each revegetated <br />area was established. Random sample locations were established for each revegetated area. <br />Within each year's revegetation parcels, sufficient samples were established to represent each <br />area by proportional acreage. The following table identifies the location of each parcel <br />quantitatively sampled, the acreage, and the number of cover and herbaceous production <br />samples taken. <br /> <br />Location Cover/Herb. Prod. <br />(minimum # <br />of samples) 2009 <br /># of Cover <br />samples taken 2009 <br /># of Herb. Prod. <br />samples taken <br />1998,1999, and 2000 <br />Reclamation Areas <br />Area 2 (1.95 ac.) 2 2 3 <br />Area 7 (1.60 ac.) 1 1 2 <br />Area 10 9.69 ac. 9 9 12 <br />Area 15 (2.73 ac.) 3 3 3 <br />Area 16 1.67 ac. 1 1 1 <br /> <br />Area 5 (2.63 ac.) 2 2 2 <br />Area 9 14.73 ac.) 13 13 18 <br /> <br />Area 6 (4.06 ac.) 8 8 11 <br />Area 19 3.23 ac• 7 7 9 <br />Total Samples 46 46 61 <br />Sample sites were located in the field through compass triangulation and pacing from known <br />landmarks. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the reclaimed areas and sample point locations <br />within each area sampled. <br />Coors Energy Company Keenesburg Mine <br />Areas 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 19 Vegetation Study (2009) <br />Page 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.