Laserfiche WebLink
September 2009 Foidel Creek Mine * Refuse Disposal Area Expansion — Surface Water Control Plan * Page 6 <br />C] <br />TABLE 3 <br />20MM Yard Ex ansion Culvert Desi ns <br />Culvert <br />Peak Flow <br />Maximum <br />Design <br />Multiples <br />(cfs) <br />Headwater (ft) <br />Diameter <br />36 -inch <br />48 -inch <br />(inches) <br />RDA -lc -1 <br />84.0 <br />3.0 <br />96 <br />7 <br />4 <br />RDA -lb -1 <br />94.0 <br />3.0 <br />108 <br />9 <br />5 <br />RDA -3 -1 <br />29.0 <br />3.0 <br />36 <br />Install minimum 36 inch <br />RDA -5a -1 <br />104.0 <br />3.5 <br />96 <br />7 <br />4 <br />RDA -5 -1 <br />104.0 <br />3.5 <br />96 <br />7 <br />4 <br />RDA -7 -1 <br />12.5 <br />3.0 <br />21 <br />Install minimum 24 -inch <br />RDA -7 -2 <br />83.5 <br />3.5 <br />84 <br />6 <br />3 <br />RDA -1 -1 <br />105.3 <br />3.5 <br />96 <br />7 <br />4 <br />Note: 1) the peak flow value used for sizing culvert RDA -7 -2 is a combination of peak flows from <br />channels RDA -7 and existing ditches D- 3A/3B. <br />2) the peak flow value used for sizing culvert RDA -1 -1 is a combination of peak flows from <br />channels RDA -lb and RDA -6. <br />5.0 Underdrain Design <br />Previous refuse disposal area investigations (CTL Thompson, 1992) report that the refuse disposal <br />• area does not classify as a valley fill according to Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for Coal Mining (1.04(148)), and is therefore not specifically required to have a <br />full sized valley fill drain. The 20MM yard refuse disposal area expansion also does classify as a <br />valley file according to Rule 1.04(148) and not required to have a full size valley fill drain. Rule <br />4.10.3(5) allows as alternative subdrainage system with approval of the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Safety and Mining (CDRMS). Consideration of the possible water sources entering the <br />refuse disposal fill (storm infiltration, snowmelt, free water from fill material) and the low sensitivity <br />of pile stability to groundwater rise suggest a limited underdrain system would be prudent. <br />Potential water sources considered in designing the underdrain included surface water flows, storm <br />infiltration and groundwater. There are no known seeps, springs or sources of groundwater in the <br />refuse disposal area; therefore, groundwater contributions were not considered significant. Surface <br />water runoff will be controlled during and after construction by the temporary ditches and postmine <br />channels. Consequently, the primary sources of water to the underdrain system will be stormwater <br />infiltration and snowmelt both during and after construction. <br />Peak flows within the underdrain should be relatively small. Although infiltration of stormwater into <br />the pile could occur fairly quickly due to the course nature of the fill material at the surface, the <br />comparatively slow movement of the water down through the compacted fill, and then along the <br />ground surface to the center of the refuse disposal area will attenuate the peak flows. <br />The 10 -year, 24 -hour storm event was evaluated for both initial pile construction and for refuse pile <br />area closure (assuming no vegetative cover over the entire pile and all flows move toward the center <br />Hydro - Environmental Solutions, Inc. <br />5710' Street, Suite B <br />P.O. Box 772996 <br />Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 <br />Revised 09/09 <br />