My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2009-10-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:36 PM
Creation date
2/9/2010 10:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/30/2009
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-123 to 2.05-197.3
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stream Standards Comparisons <br /> • The State of Colorado stream standards applicable for the study area consist of: <br /> • Segment 13a: Trout Creek and tributaries excluding Segments 13b and 13c not within a National <br /> Forest <br /> • Segment 13b: Foidel Creek and all tributaries, Fish Creeks and Middle Creeks and all tributaries <br /> from County Road 27 to confluence with Trout Creek <br /> • Segment 13c: Trout Creek from headgate of Spruce Hill Ditch to confluence with Fish Creek and <br /> Tributaries to Trout Creek for County Road 27 to County Road 179 <br /> • Segment 2: Yampa River, mainstem <br /> The segments have the similar water quality standards, except that segment 13a includes drinking water <br /> standards for active water supply uses, Segment 13b does not include drinking water standards and Segment 13c <br /> includes drinking water standards from June through February. The effect of these segment standards is that the <br /> sulfate standard is not applicable to the mine discharge impacted reaches of Foidel, Fish, Middle and Trout <br /> Creeks year- round. The relevant stream segments are shown on Exhibit 50, Figure E50 -4). <br /> In this section, comparisons of ambient water quality conditions are made with applicable standards for selected <br /> trace metals and inorganic chemical constituents. For a number of constituents, ambient concentrations were <br /> found to frequently exceed the associated stream standard (Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality <br /> Modeling Analyses of Surface -Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin). This incompatibility between <br /> standards and ambient conditions supported results of a similar baseline survey throughout the Yampa River <br /> Basin (Wentz and Steele, 1980). The purpose of this comparison is to indicate that exceedances of certain <br /> stream standards occur even before considering the impacts of additional mine flows. The several types of data <br /> available for this analysis are provided in Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water <br /> • Resources of the Trout Creek Basin. <br /> The average and ranges of concentrations for several trace metals of interest in this comparison of ambient <br /> conditions with State of Colorado stream standards are summarized in Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and <br /> Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin. In the cases of other trace <br /> metals, ambient levels exceeded standards for boron, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc concentrations <br /> (Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout <br /> Creek Basin). Past monitoring indicated that the mine discharges did not have significant amount of boron. <br /> Therefore, boron monitoring was discontinued. The mine discharges are monitored for manganese and iron. <br /> Only occasional exceedances have occurred (a total of 18 in 1997 and 1998). In addition, no exceedances of the <br /> manganese or iron in- stream standards attributable to the mining operations have been observed (Annual <br /> Hydrologic Reports). <br /> In the case of chloride, available data indicated average ambient concentrations consistently less than 20 mg /1, <br /> compared to a stream standard of 250 mg/1 (Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface <br /> Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin). For sulfate, ambient conditions exceeded the State of Colorado <br /> stream standard of 250 mg/1 at the following four monitoring sites (Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and <br /> Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin) for site locations: <br /> Site 39, Foidel Creek Tributary, 295 mg/1 <br /> Site 14, Foidel Creek, 276 mg/1 <br /> Site 8/2005, Foidel Creek, 814 mg/1 <br /> Site 29, Middle Creek, 360 mg/1 <br /> • In addition, sulfate exceeded stream standards from October 1980 to December 1983 21 percent of the time. <br /> This is the period of record before mining commenced in 1984 at the Foidel Creek underground mine. <br /> Moreover, reported ranges indicate standard exceedances by ambient sulfate concentrations in Fish Creek (Table <br /> 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek <br /> PR09 -08 2.05 -157 04/27/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.