My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-05_REVISION - C1996083 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-02-05_REVISION - C1996083 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:21 PM
Creation date
2/9/2010 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/5/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response No. 1
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR65
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.04.7 Hydrology Description <br />• In late 2004, the Operator attempted to drill an exploratory hole from a location <br />approximately 2,500 feet northwest of the approved site. Poor hole conditions <br />were encountered immediately. As depth increased, the rock became more <br />fractured and keeping the hole open became virtually impossible. At a depth of <br />2,612 feet the core bit was permanently stuck in the hole. All down hole <br />assemblies were twisted off and cemented into the hole. The fractured rock is <br />attributed to both the igneous Iron Point intrusion and depth of cover. Similar <br />drilling conditions are expected at potential monitoring well site DH-68. <br />The Operator does not believe it is economically or technically practicable to <br />install down gradient monitoring wells north of the proposed mine plan area. <br />The rugged terrain limits potential drill sites. The only location where a <br />reasonable depth monitoring well could be constructed is in Hubbard Creek but <br />the UDSA-FS does not want the Hubbard Creek road re-opened. Opening the <br />Hubbard Creek road would be problematic because of public opposition, road <br />slope instability and potential flooding. <br />It is highly unlikely the public will use the deep bedrock groundwater located north <br />of the proposed mine plan area. It is simply too expensive to install a domestic or <br />livestock well at such extreme depths. The poor water quality would also <br />discourage public use. The lack of deep bedrock groundwater monitoring data is <br />somewhat mitigated by the highly unlikely public use of the water. <br />• Based on the above discussion, the Operator requests relief from the installation <br />of a down gradient monitoring well for the northwestern mining districts <br />contemplated by PR-10, PR-11 and TR-65. <br />(b) The subsurface hydrologic regime may be divided into four discrete subsystems: <br />1) the alluvium and terrace deposits associated with the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River; 2) localized deposits of alluvium-colluvium within the Hubbard <br />Creek, and Terror Creek area; 3) groundwater occurrences within the Mesaverde <br />Formation; and 4) colluvial discharges associated with soil moisture storage in <br />Steven's Draw, C-Gulch and at the head of Freeman, Sheep Corral and Dove <br />Gulches. <br />North Fork of the Gunnison River Alluvium <br />Alluvial fill associated with the North Fork of the Gunnison River and tributary <br />drainages (Terror Creek) have been extensively developed for domestic and <br />agricultural water sources. For a discussion of Alluvial Valley Floors, see section <br />2.06.8. The State Engineer's records depict 3 registered wells completed within <br />the alluvium located in Sections 14, and 15., T.13 S., R.92 W., 6th P.M. (Bowie <br />No. 1 Mine Area) <br />These wells range from 14 feet to 77 feet deep and typically produce water from <br />12 feet. The well yield ranges from 5 gpm to 120 gpm with average yields of <br />• approximately 17 gpm. Water quality is highly variable within the alluvial fill. <br />Most wells completed near the river sustain quality adequate for human <br />consumption; however, the higher sulfate and total dissolved solids values are <br />TR-65 2.04 - 25 - 02/10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.