My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-04_PERMIT FILE - M2009018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009018
>
2010-02-04_PERMIT FILE - M2009018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:17 PM
Creation date
2/9/2010 7:36:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009018
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/4/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review- 06
From
DRMS
To
Varra Companies, Inc.
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />February 4, 2010 <br />Brad Janes <br />Varra Companies, Inc. <br />8120 Gage St. <br />Frederick, CO 80516 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />James B. Martin <br />Executive Director <br />RE: Heintzelman Project (Pit 116); DRMS File No. M-2009-018; Adequacy Review - 06 <br />Dear Mr. Janes, <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has identified several other <br />comments and questions that must be addressed prior to the Division's decision due date. Please <br />be advised that if you are unable to satisfactorily address any concerns identified in this <br />review before the decision date, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of the <br />review period. If there are outstanding issues that have not been adequately addressed <br />prior to the end of the review period, and no extension has been requested, the Division will <br />deny this application. <br />6.4.7 Exhibit G - Water Information <br />The Division has received the water level data from the Varra Del Camino site, submitted by <br />CGRS on January 27, 2010. The information provided to the Division did not contain enough <br />data to properly characterize the local groundwater hydrology. Therefore, the Division <br />cannot approve the Applicant's proposed trigger point. The Division has identified the <br />following options in regard to satisfying this adequacy issue: <br />a. Commit to not exposing groundwater until five quarters of baseline elevations from <br />the proposed monitoring wells have been collected, to be measured on a monthly <br />basis. The collected data shall be submitted to the Division as a Technical Revision, <br />at which time the Division will review the data and establish dewatering trigger <br />points. <br />b. In lieu of collecting five quarters of baseline data, the Applicant may provide the <br />Division with historic groundwater data, through a Technical Revision, which <br />adequately characterizes the local hydrology. The Division would review the data and <br />establish appropriate dewatering trigger points. <br />c. The Applicant may also choose to obtain agreements between Varra Companies and <br />well owners within the defined cone of depression, stating Varra Companies is to <br />provide a form of compensation to the well owners in the event their wells are <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.