My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2010-02-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:09 PM
Creation date
2/2/2010 3:06:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/1/2010
Doc Name
Response to Letter on Perimeter Markers
From
Blue Mountain Energy
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition, the perimeter of the permit area is marked by GPS. A GPS unit is available with the <br />perimeter of the permit area marked as a track or other appropriate feature and easily identified. <br />This unit is available for the inspector's use at the place where the mine records are kept. A <br />computer file of standard GPS transfer format or other format as accepted by the Division <br />containing the permit area boundary will be provided to the Division for entry into GPS units <br />provided by the Division. This GPS permit area perimeter and GPS unit will be maintained by <br />the operator until final bond release. <br />Discussion of Plan Concepts <br />Perimeter marker posts would be installed only where they may serve a useful purpose. In areas <br />where the permit area boundary is greater than 200 feet from the edge of areas affected by <br />surface operations or facilities there is little risk of inadvertent offsite impacts occurring due to <br />the lack of marker posts. <br />The character of areas affected by surface operations or facilities at the Deserado Mine is such <br />that continued systematic expansion does not occur. As opposed to the uncertainty of locations <br />discussed in the preamble to 817.11 all proposed disturbances are surveyed in the field with a <br />GPS then verified with a highly accurate orthophoto and/or conventional survey methods. Most <br />such activities require BME to intersect with the underground mine workings at a very precise <br />location such as with ventilation shafts and nitrogen injection holes. Missing our targets by only <br />a few feet can be very costly to BME. Degas borehole locations are slightly more flexible but <br />must fall within the longwall panel, well inside the permit area boundary. <br />Provisions are made to avoid needless placement of perimeter marker posts in situations where a <br />prominent feature, such as a road or stream, separates the areas affected by surface operations or <br />facilities and the permit area boundary. The case in point is the raw water pipeline from the <br />White River to the Raw Water Lagoon. For a short stretch this surface pipeline comes within <br />200 feet of the permit area boundary. However, the portion of the permit area boundary in <br />question is across County Road 65 and in no risk of impacts due to the absence of perimeter <br />marker posts. Prominent features serve as a `do-not-cross' boundary for construction crews as <br />well as serving as an easily identifiable feature for the inspector to use when verifying proper <br />facility placement. <br />The entire permit area boundary is currently marked on a GPS. This system is very accurate, <br />easy to use by both the operator and inspector, cost effective, easy to update and maintain, and <br />provides the Division with a means to verify locations of areas affected by surface operations or <br />facilities relative to the permit area. Utilization of GPS technology avoids the needless <br />placement of highly visible markers on our public lands. In addition, removal of markers at final <br />bond release will not be an issue. Perimeter marker posts can be removed once they no longer <br />serve a useful purpose not already served by the GPS. Retaining the perimeter marked by GPS
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.