My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-29_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009082
>
2010-01-29_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:06 PM
Creation date
2/2/2010 7:50:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009082
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/29/2010
Doc Name
FW Amount and Approval Stipulation
From
DRMS
To
Vecchi & Associates, LLC
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />January 29th, 2010 <br />Jennifer Vecchi <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />- SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Vecchi & Associates, LLC Ronald W. Cattany <br />P.O. Box 1175 Division Director <br />Longmont, Colorado 80502-1175 Natural Resource Trustee <br />RE: Parsons Mine, DRMS File# M-2009-082; 112c Permit Application, Financial Warranty Amount <br />and Approval Stipulation. <br />Dear Mrs. Vecchi, <br />The Division received your response to the adequacy reviews on January 21st, 2010 and Scott Palmers e- <br />mail response from Deer and Ault in regards to Adequacy Review #4 on January 281h, 2010. The <br />information submitted satisfies the Division concerns. In regards to the financial warranty, the Division <br />has several points we would like to clarify. <br />Rule 6.4.12 Exhibit L - Reclamation Cost Estimate <br />Item #24 in your response to the Division's Adequacy Reviews proposes a plan to update the financial <br />warranty annually. In order to ensure the proper amount of financial warranty is held for the operation, <br />the Division would approve the application with a stipulation that the financial warranty must be <br />reviewed every year and increased if necessary for the life of the mine. This stipulation is listed below <br />under the heading "Stipulation". This stipulation will become a requirement for the entire life of the <br />permit and failure to comply with the stipulation will result in a possible violation, cease and desist order <br />and civil penalties. <br />Pursuant to C.R.S. 34-32.5-117 (1) a permit shall not be issued under this article until the board receives <br />the performance and financial warranty. Lafarge has indicated they do not intend on disturbing the <br />mine site in 2010; however, in order to issue a permit a financial warranty must be submitted. Initially, <br />the Financial Warranty will be set at $15,300.00 which would cover the Division's indirect cost of permit <br />revocation, financial warranty forfeiture and several site maintenance costs such as weed control. <br />Stipulation: <br />Prior to affecting any land within the permit area, the Operator shall submit and receive approval from <br />the Division of a financial warranty that will cover the cost to reclaim one year's worth of disturbance. <br />The Operator will not be allowed to expose ground water until enough financial warranty has been <br />submitted and approved by the Division to account for the exposure of ground water for a year's worth <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.