My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-21_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009082
>
2010-01-21_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:47 PM
Creation date
1/29/2010 7:45:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009082
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/21/2010
Doc Name
Stability Analysis
From
Deere & Ault Consultants, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phase 5B and 5C <br />The soil profile analyzed was based on soil information from exploration location MW-9. An <br />overburden stockpile was placed southeast of each mining cell. Flood irrigation, south of each mining <br />cell, was simulated by raising the piezometric surface, at the fenceline (70-feet from the mining <br />highwall), above the highest monitored surface to the ground surface. <br />Longterm <br />This stability run uses the lithology of Phase IA. The soil profile analyzed was based on soil <br />information from exploration location ET02-131-105. <br />Flood irrigation, north of WCR 64'/2, was simulated by raising the piezometric surface, under the road <br />and in the borrow ditch just south of the existing road, above the highest monitored surface to the <br />ground surface. <br />The road is planned to be widened. The widening will result in the ditch being relocated southward. <br />DRMS Analysis, Hgghwall Setback to Property Line <br />The Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety (DRMS) requires that gravel pit highwalls within 200 <br />feet of significant manmade permanent structures (such as utilities) be investigated for slope stability. <br />Furthermore, the DRMS requires that the gravel mine highwalls be modeled as vertical unless it can be <br />demonstrated that the slope angle of the highwall will be controlled during mining. Additionally, the <br />DRMS requires that the analysis be performed using the DRMS parameters for sites where laboratory <br />testing is absent. These parameters are given below on Table 2: <br />Table 2: DRMS Model Parameters <br /> <br />Soil Type Effective <br />Friction Angle <br />(degrees) Effective <br />Cohesion <br />c' (Psi) Saturated Unit <br />Weight <br />., (Pct) <br />Overburden 28 50 114 <br />Gravel 35 0 130 <br />Weathered Bedrock 14 0 124 <br />Bedrock 28 100 124 <br />The parameters for weathered bedrock are much more conservative than those typically encountered in <br />the project area and, it is our opinion, that they are not representative of conditions at the site. <br />We analyzed a vertical highwall section for each phase. The depth to bedrock varied from 7 to 31 feet <br />across the project site. The vertical section corresponds to a steep highwall mining scenario where the <br />highwall inclination is approximately 0.5:1. <br />Table 3 below summarizes the results of our analysis. The analysis was performed using the DRMS <br />parameters shown in Table 2. The factor of safety required by the DRMS for temporary mine slopes <br />and reservoir embankments are provided for comparison. Output graphics for each of the analyses are <br />attached. <br />Parsons Mine <br />DRMS 112 Permit <br />Page SE5 of SE7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.