My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - M2010002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010002
>
2010-01-25_PERMIT FILE - M2010002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 3:31:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010002
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/25/2010
Doc Name
Preliminary adequacy review
From
DRMS
To
Wagner Rock LLC.
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prelimin??v Adeauacy Review 110c <br />M-2010-002 <br />Waener Pit <br />the applicant shall provide proof of publication as required per Rule 6.2.2(d). <br />Per Rule 1.6.2(8) <br />It is noted that proof of notice for owners of record of lands within 200 feet of the propose <br />boundaries has been submitted. <br />Per Rule 6.2.1(2)(b) all maps must be signed by a registered land surveyor, professional <br />engineer, or other qualified person, give date prepared and identify and outline the area <br />which corresponds with the application. Staff notes no signatures on the mine and <br />reclamation maps. <br />Per Rule 6.3, Specific requirements for a 110c Reclamation Operation: <br />6.3.1- Exhibit A, Legal Description, appears to be adequate. <br />6.3.2 - Exhibit B, Site Description <br />(a) Is adequate. <br />(b) Is adequate. <br />(c) Appears to be adequate. DRMS has not received any comments from the Division o <br />Water Resources. <br />(d) It is noted that the applicant contacted DOW and included their response in the <br />application. <br />6.3.3 - Exhibit C, Mining Plan. <br />(a) Is adequate. <br />(b), Is adequate. <br />(c), Is adequate. <br />(d), Is adequate. <br />(e), Please clarify that all stockpiles will be within the permitted area. <br />(f), Is adequate. <br />(g), Is adequate. <br />(h), (i) and (j) appear to be adequate but as noted no comments from DWR has been <br />received. <br />(k), It is noted that a portable asphalt and ove sp?I twill be handled to ensure that it does <br />submit a plan of how asphalt reject round or surface waters. <br />not come in contact with or contaminate, g <br />(1), Is adequate. <br />(m), Is adequate. <br />(n), Is adequate. <br />(o), is adequate. <br />(p), Please clarify that no explosives will be used in the mining operation. <br />6.3.4 - Exhibit D, Reclamation Plan <br />(1), (a) Please note that DRMS recommends using the approved reclamation seed mix <br />for topsoil stockpile protection if left in place for more than 180 days or 1 growing <br />season.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.