My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-22_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-01-22_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:51 PM
Creation date
1/25/2010 12:47:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/22/2010
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Western Fuels-Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C-1981-008 <br />PR-06 PAR <br />22-Jan-2010 <br />Page 21 of 26 <br />provided in the application indicates that historically, most of the Morgan property has <br />been irrigated and used for crop production. <br />Based on soil survey documentation and NRCS review, WFC has acknowledged that the <br />entire acreage is considered prime farmland soil or potential prime farmland, and has <br />committed to implement specific soil salvage, handling, and replacement procedures <br />applicable to prime farmland soils over the entire property. At issue is the extent of <br />acreage on the property that can be adequately irrigated with the irrigation water <br />available to WFC, to establish and maintain alfalfa hay cropland stands at appropriate <br />production levels. In a letter dated August 4, 2009, the NRCS Norwood area Resource <br />Conservationist stated that "if, during reclamation, there are portions of these prime <br />farmland soils where adequate irrigation water is not available to grow a crop, then <br />technically they lose their prime farmland status. In this situation, it is unrealistic for <br />these areas to be held to a cropland production goal. Alternatively, the reclaimed <br />vegetative community could be a mixture of drought tolerant grasses and forbs, and <br />designated as dryland pasture. If, at a later date, adequate irrigation water becomes <br />available for these lands they would again be considered prime farmland, particularly <br />since the soils have been reclaimed accordingly." <br />WFC states that the irrigation water available to them for irrigation use on the Morgan <br />property during the reclamation liability period is 50 shares of CC ditch water, and they <br />have provided a copy of the lease document that specifies 50 shares. Within Section <br />2.05.4(2)(e)(2.0) of the application, WFC presents reasoning to support a conclusion that <br />1.2 acres per share of water could prudently be irrigated using a side roll sprinkler, and <br />based on that ratio, they have proposed a reclamation plan for the Morgan property that <br />would entail establishment of irrigated alfalfa hay cropland (Prime Farmland) on 60.1 <br />acres of the Morgan property, with the remaining 47.9 acres to be reclaimed to "Potential <br />Cropland" (i.e. soil criteria meeting prime farmland requirements, seeded to meet dryland <br />pasture revegetation standards). WFC presents supporting calculations for their projected <br />acre/share ratio in Attachment 2.05.4(2)(e)-7 of the application. <br />The Division accepts the concept put forth by WFC of reclaiming a portion of the acreage <br />to irrigated cropland and a portion to potential cropland, based on the extent of acreage <br />that will be irrigated. This is consistent with the evaluation presented in the August 4, <br />2009 NRCS letter. However, in a letter dated December 8, 2009, NRCS identified a <br />number of flaws in the supporting information presented in Attachment 2.05.4(2)(e)(7), <br />regarding calculation procedures and data reliability. In the letter, MRCS presented <br />justification to validate their earlier determinations regarding crop water use and side roll <br />sprinkler capabilities. NRCS concluded that, with good farming practices and proper <br />irrigation water management, 50 shares of CC Ditch water should be sufficient to supply <br />three full length sideroll sprinklers, servicing 71 acres, and grow a productive alfalfa crop <br />that meets the average yields established for bond release. <br />Please revise Attachment 2.05.4(2)(e)(7) to reflect the changes specified by NRCS in <br />their December 8, 2009 letter, and revise the reclamation plan narrative, tables, and <br />Map 2.05.4-5 to conform with sideroll irrigation and alfalfa hay crop production on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.