Laserfiche WebLink
C-1981-008 <br />PR-06 PAR <br />22-Jan-2010 <br />Page 10 of 26 <br />Much of the information presented for the Pond 012 re-design appears to be inconsistent and <br />it is unclear what the revised SEDCAD runs are attempting to demonstrate. If WFC is <br />proposing to change the spillway configurations then this should be clearly explained and <br />the SEDCAD demonstrations need to reflect accurate information. A new As-Built <br />Certification would be required if the pond configuration or spillway elevations are changed. <br />Please clearly explain why Pond 012 is being re-designed and clarify the discrepancies <br />noted in the revised SEDCAD demonstrations as described above. <br />25. Pond 013 is also being re-designed because it will receive increased drainage due to WFC's <br />decision to eliminated Pond 010. With this revised design WFC demonstrates that the as <br />built pond is sufficient to handle the revised drainage area. Spillway elevations remain the <br />same and the pond configuration is not changing therefore WFC did not resubmit the As- <br />Built Certification map but did submit a revised Engineering and Hydrologic Design and As <br />Built SEDCAD and SurvCad hydrology calculations. Only one minor inconsistency was <br />identified on the existing approved As-Built. The emergency spillway elevation is <br />incorrectly labeled on Map 2.05.3(3)-18 as 5657' and should be 5557'. <br />Please check this elevation and make the necessary correction to Map 2.05.3(3) -18. <br />26. On page 2.05.3(3)-6-34 of the original Pond 013 Design Calculations, permit text regarding <br />manual operation of the pond was taken out of the permit document with PR-6. This <br />appears to be the case for the Pond 011 Design Calculations as well. This language was a <br />permit condition that was placed on the permit application package with the last Midterm <br />Review and more recently with TR-56. <br />Please reincorporate this language (see strike out on page 2.05.3(3)-6-34) into the <br />Engineering and Hydrologic Designs for Ponds 011 and 013. Otherwise provide a <br />detailed explanation why this permit language should be removed from the permit <br />document. <br />27. Pond 015 is a new pond design submitted with PR-6. This pond is designed to capture and <br />contain without discharge the 100-year24-hour precipitation event. The operator has <br />successfully demonstrated that the temporary impoundment will safely control the design <br />precipitation event. However, the operator has not demonstrated how the water will be <br />removed. <br />In accordance with Rule 4.05.9(2)(e) provide a demonstration that the water from the <br />pond will be safely removed in accordance with current, prudent, engineering <br />practices. Attachment 2.05.3(3)-20 should be certified by a registered professional <br />engineer. <br />28. Inconsistencies were noted in Attachment 2.05.3(3)-20 regarding principal and emergency <br />spillways for Pond 015. The text on pages 2 and 6 of the attachment indicate that there is no <br />embankment that could fail and no spillways are required. However, on the Stage Storage <br />Curve (page 9), the top of structure is labeled as 5572.00' and principal and emergency