My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-20_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-01-20_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:45 PM
Creation date
1/21/2010 1:13:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/20/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Memo
From
Mike Boulay
To
Marcia Talvitie
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />TO: Marcia Talvitie Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />MA FROM: Mike Boulay <br />DATE: January 20, 2010 <br />SUBJECT: Western Fuels-Colorado, New Horizon Mine (Permit No. C-81-008), <br />Permit Revision No. 6 (PR-6) <br />As requested, I have reviewed Western Fuels-Colorado's (WFC's) PR-6 application. I have the <br />following adequacy review comments. <br />1. WFC submitted a re-design for Pond 011 and new As-built Certification. WFC indicates on <br />page 2.05.3(3)-14-2 that the drainage basins in both pre mine and post mine situations have <br />changed. The pre mine drainage basin should remain constant. Please clarify and explain <br />how the pre mine drainage basin situation has changed. <br />2. Pond 011 is being re-designed because it will receive a greater drainage area than originally <br />designed due to the decision by WFC to eliminate Pond 010. There are no proposed <br />changes to spillway configurations and only design input parameters will be modified. Both <br />the Engineering and Hydrologic Design and the As-Built SEDCAD demonstration were re- <br />submitted along with a new Map 2.05.3(3)-17 As-Built Certification. The revised <br />application materials presented for design and as built configuration are consistent. Only <br />one minor error was noted. The Stage Storage Curve on the new Pond 011, As Built shows <br />an incorrect principal spillway elevation as compared to the SEDCAD runs and the <br />approved As-Built Certification. Please check this elevation and make the necessary <br />correction to Map 2.05.3(3) -17. <br />3. The revised text on page 2.05.3(3)-12-3 does not clearly explain why a revised pond design <br />is necessary for Pond 012. In the third paragraph WFC states that "the post mine drainage <br />area is larger than the pre-mine", but also in that same paragraph states "the pre-mine <br />drainage area is 55.1 acres while the post mine area is 38.1 acres". This is inconsistent and <br />it is unclear if the as built pond is sufficient to handle the revised drainage area. If the As- <br />Built Certification is correct and no pond configuration changes are proposed then a new <br />design would be unnecessary. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.