Laserfiche WebLink
<br />prove to anyone how many shares will irrigate what. This information was already accepted <br />before WFC entered that piece of property. When WFC asked us how many shares it took to <br />irrgated the Sunshine and what they are mining, we told them 50 shares. They knew we were t <br />getting large productions and they accepted that and guaranteed it would be put back like it was. <br />It does not matter whether they think this is true, now. This WAS a very productive PRIME <br />FARMLAND AND HAS BEEN NOTED AS SUCH AND DOCUMENTED AS SUCH. It does <br />not matter what DRMS or NRCS , or WFC, thinks it should have to irrigate it. It was being <br />completely irrigated and in very NIC E CROPLAND before they entered it and it has to be <br />returned in a PRODUCTIVE capacity like it was!!!!! We are not asking them to change <br />anything, not to CHANGE anything, just put it back as good as or better thanit was which is what <br />tha MIlrIIING industry is doing over the entire country. It is DRMS' job to see that they do just <br />tht. <br />There does not have to be the farmer having to sue to get it done. This has always been a 1 <br />falsehood. It is a DRMS law and is suppose to be enforced by DBMS. <br />I will continue my research and continue sending proof <br />Thank You, <br />7oElien Turner <br />December 10, 2009 <br />We have one other question. Why can't WFC just return the soil over entire property in the <br />depths promised in the farmable condition that their equipment is able to do and we just sign off <br />on it and have them get off our property and we'll disk, level. Rock pick, cultipack, seed, <br />fertilize, irrigate, and farm like it was and we'll do everything ourselves and sign off completely <br />for them to have no responsibilities or liabilities and we'll do it??????????