My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-11_HYDROLOGY - C1982057 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2010-01-11_HYDROLOGY - C1982057 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:29 PM
Creation date
1/11/2010 8:48:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
1/11/2010
Doc Name
4th Quarter 2009 Sedimentation Pond Inspection
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Sediment Pond Inspect
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k, <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Water, Sediment, or Slurry Impoundments <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Dennis Jones <br />NPDES I.D. NO.: CO-0000221 D.P. 005 <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Cross-Valley Pond <br />SITE NAME: Pond #005 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II-W Mine (Seneca Coal Co <br />MINE I.D. NO.: CMLRD Permit No. C-82-057 <br />DATE: <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 9? -2 L-0-9 <br />LOCATION: NWl/, SWl/,, Sec. 10, TSN, R88W <br />LOCATION: 8 mi. S of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Roy Karo, Gen Mgr <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Foundation preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil: Yes <br />2. Lift thickness: 12 in. <br />3. Compaction according to approved plan: Yes <br />4. Burning (specify extent and location): No <br />5. Angle of slope: 3.5:1 upstream, 2.5:1 downstream Total = 6:1 <br />6. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> From underdrain pipes: I " S -4L-.- M I C CA- 10 t^,% t,,_ Y S No N/A <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes No N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes No N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes No N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes No N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes No N/A <br />7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes No N/A <br />8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes No N/A <br />9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes No N/A <br />10. *Major erosion problems: Yes No N/A <br />11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes No N/A <br />12. *Erosion of toe: Yes No N/A <br />13. *Water impounded against toe: Yes N/A <br />14. Existing embankment eeboard: (normal = 7.41) / feet <br />15. Increase Decrease in water level: feet <br />16. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes No N/A <br />17. Visible sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: N/A <br />18. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels and pipes: Yes No N/A <br /> Decant system: Inoperable Yes No /A <br /> Diversion ditches: N/A <br />19. *Cracking or crushing of pipes <br /> Spillway pipes: Yes N/A <br /> Decant system: Inoperable Yes No <br />20. Trash racks clear and in place: es Affi?t N/A o <br />21. Discharge rate (gpm) ho 'W'Ia 4-3 <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to the <br />Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse conditions noted in <br />these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc.) in the space on the <br />back of this sheet. 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.