My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:06 PM
Creation date
1/6/2010 9:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
Aspen Study Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Appendix 22-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Preliminary Background Studies: <br />A pilot study was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of supplemental <br />irrigation on growth and survival of transplanted aspen sapling trees, but the <br />experimental conditions allowed observation on several additional variables. In addition <br />to irrigation (four levels of watering), we were able to observe growth and survival of <br />aspen of different plant type (transplants, natural sprouts, or potted plants), soil type <br />(roto- cleared /fresh or dozer - cleared /stored soil), and different levels of plant <br />competition (hand removal of competing vegetation or no removal). Results of the <br />preliminary study are reported here as background and rationale for the current study: <br />Irrigation: <br />Best growth and survival was with low or no irrigation, but salinity of irrigation <br />water in the first two years of the experiment reduced growth of trees receiving high <br />and medium amounts of irrigation. Care must therefore be taken to provide low saline <br />water when irrigating planted aspen trees on reclaimed lands. Low level irrigation and <br />no irrigation growth and survival were similar, suggesting that enough rainfall occurred <br />during the initial years of this experiment so that soil moisture was adequate without <br />irrigation. <br />Plant source <br />Transplanted trees from local sources grew best once established. Most natural <br />suckers did not survive without removal of competing vegetation. Potted plants had a <br />high rate of survival and seemed to grow well the first year, but growth was lower than <br />for transplants and natural sprouts after three years. Roots of the potted aspen <br />generally stayed in the augured potting hole. <br />Soil type: <br />Best growth and survival occurred on roto - cleared (fresh) soil compared to dozer <br />cleared (stored) soil. More natural sprouts from residual root segments were evident in <br />roto- cleared soil. It is expected that the higher number of natural sprouts was due to <br />the shorter length of soil storage and the soil characteristics rather than the clearing <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.