My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:06 PM
Creation date
1/6/2010 9:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
Aspen Study Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Appendix 22-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the 10 non - weeded trees survived after 3 years. Most of the vegetative competition <br />consisted of annual herbs, perennial grasses, and weed species. Weed present were <br />primarily various thistle species. Shading was not a factor, since the trees were larger and <br />growing above the competing vegetation canopy. The soil moisture data suggest <br />competition between surface vegetation and trees for a limited amount of available water. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Irrigation: <br />Best growth and survival was with low or no irrigation, but salinity of irrigation water in <br />the first two years of the experiment reduced growth of trees receiving high and medium <br />amounts of irrigation. Reclaimed soils were not saline, but salinity levels were high <br />enough in irrigation water from local ponds to reduce growth of aspen. Care must be <br />taken to provide low saline water when irrigating planted aspen trees on reclaimed lands. <br />Low level irrigation and no irrigation growth and survival were similar, suggesting that <br />enough rainfall and soil moisture occurred for the years this experiment so that irrigation <br />was not necessary. It is expected but not tested in this experiment, that supplemental <br />irrigation with clean water may have increased growth and survival above non - irrigated <br />trees. It is expected that all surviving trees now have developed enough root system after <br />three years that further irrigation is not needed. <br />Plant source: <br />Transplanted trees from local sources grew best once established. Most natural suckers <br />did not survive without weeding. Potted plant had a high rate of survival, but growth was <br />lower then for transplants and natural sprouts. Roots of potted aspen general stayed in the <br />augured potting hole. This also occurred for a few of the transplanted trees in the more <br />compact stored dozer cleared soil on the irrigation treatment plots, the same soil type <br />where this occurred for the potted plants. <br />Soil type: <br />Best growth and survival occurred on roto - cleared (fresh) soil compared to dozer cleared <br />(stored) soil. More natural sprouts from residual root segments were evident in roto- <br />cleared soil. It is expected that higher number of natural sprouts was due to the shorter <br />length of soil storage and the soil characteristics rather than the clearing method. The <br />dozer cleared soil appeared to be more compacted and was less well drained than the <br />roto - cleared soil, and it is expected that these physical characteristics were more <br />important to tree growth than the method of clearing. Also, storage effects on the soil <br />were likely more important than method of clearing. <br />Weed control: <br />r� <br />U <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.