My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:06 PM
Creation date
1/6/2010 9:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
Aspen Study Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Appendix 22-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S II. Best growth appeared to be on natural root segment sprouts on roto - cleared soil for the <br />first year. Transplanted trees grew well after the first year's transplant shock. <br />III. Transplanted sprouts showed considerable transplant injury their first year, regardless <br />of irrigation treatment in this relatively wet. Growth and survival was relatively low and <br />diseases were higher in transplant cutting plots compared to natural sprouts and potted <br />plants. Recovery of surviving transplant trees was good and growth was good the second <br />year. <br />IV. Potted aspen from nursery stock planted on dozer - cleared soil grew well and had high <br />survival the first year. <br />V. Fencing is necessary to protect small aspen trees from browsing injury. <br />EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES/METHODOLOGIES FOR 2007 <br />Study Design: <br />Based on the important finding for 2005 -2006 summarized above, several new questions <br />regarding aspen growth and survival on reclaimed lands arose, and follow -up research <br />was conducted using the same II -W Mine plots where the 2005 -2006 study was <br />conduced. Our intention was to utilize the existing study design and sampling regime to <br />collect third year survival and growth data from trees sampled in 2005 -2006. OSM <br />funding was used for data collection during 2007 and for data analysis and preparation of <br />the final report. Details of operation of the irrigation system, types of planted aspen <br />studied and sampling procedures remained as previously described. Deviations and <br />additions to the original study design are described below. <br />Irrigation Treatments: <br />Based on findings from 2005 and the higher than normal rainfall, irrigation treatments <br />were applied differently during the 2006 and 2007 growing seasons. Treatments were <br />applied at 0.0, 0. 15, 0.3, or 0.6 gallons each day of treatment, one -half the rate applied in <br />2005. Irrigation treatments were to be continued throughout the growing season. Because <br />of evidence of saline condition of the irrigation water supply during 2005 - 2006, clean <br />potable water from a <br />Hayden, CO, hydrant was used to irrigate the trees in 2007. <br />Growth of transplanted rooted sprouts in the second and third year: Some of the <br />transplanted aspen in the irrigation plots had apparent dead tops after the first year. It was <br />expected that some of these could grow back from root sprouts. We examined survival <br />and re -growth of these trees that died back from injury or disease the first year. It was <br />• expected that surviving plants would do well in the second year following first year <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.