My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:06 PM
Creation date
1/6/2010 9:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
Aspen Study Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Appendix 22-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECT ABSTRACT <br />Successful re- establishment of aspen on surface -mined lands in the western United States <br />is problematic, because the species regenerates vegetatively by sprouting from parent <br />roots in the soil which is removed in the mining process. Previous attempts to plant aspen <br />seedlings on reclaimed mines have failed because transplanted root sprouts or seedlings <br />do not have an extensive root system to access water and nutrients for rapid growth. This <br />research builds on work previously funded by the Seneca Coal Company in western <br />Colorado to identify factors that limit the growth and survival of planted aspen. The use <br />of supplemental irrigation to help establish planted aspen was tested; and growth and <br />survival of three types of aspen stock on two soil types were compared. Soil and water <br />conditions were monitored, and the effect of weed control on planting success was <br />examined. The best combination of conditions for reproduction of aspen on reclaimed <br />surface mined coal lands uses transplanted saplings from local sources on freshly placed <br />soil removed from aspen stands. Growth was significantly higher when weeds were <br />controlled around individual trees. Irrigation with non - saline water may enhance growth <br />and survival in years with drought conditions. <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br />Objectives: <br />1. Determine if supplemental drip irrigation will allow transplanted aspen saplings to <br />survive and grow on reclaimed surface mined lands at a western Colorado site. <br />2. Quantify second and third -year growth and physiologic condition of bare -root saplings <br />transplanted to replaced topsoil, aspen sprouting from root segments transferred with <br />replaced topsoil, and nursery -grown potted aspen saplings planted in replaced topsoil. <br />3. Compare irrigation water quality and characteristics of replaced topsoil to that of water <br />and soils in intact aspen groves located on adjacent un -mined lands. <br />4. Quantify the effects of mechanical weed control on growth and survival of young <br />aspen trees. <br />5. Quantify root growth and development of transplanted aspen saplings, natural root <br />sprouts, and nursery -grown potted aspen seedlings after three growing seasons. <br />Background: <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.