Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Mortality and Plant Competition <br />50 <br />9 00 • • ♦aspen <br />.rvicebeny <br />xn 30 <br />9 20 <br />F <br />° 10 <br />0 <br />0 100 200 300 <br />Biomaw of Competing Vegetation, gmlm <br />is <br />• <br />Figure 8. Relationship of plant mortality to biomass of competing vegetation. <br />Plots with the highest aspen mortality were from the Yoast site. <br />Figure 9. Aspen survival by site location in response to landscape fabric and <br />irrigation. Note Yoast 2a and 21h had the most competing vegetation biomass. <br />19 <br />• 2= <br />Pe ment ASpan Survival by SiOe <br />a2wse <br />oYI <br />• Yza <br />mw <br />e v2n <br />xe <br />o• •. <br />inp•tlm +pkePtlon hUnM <br />Ib F+Ytlm <br />Hbk Hdk Ib Hbk <br />1b Hbk <br />Figure 9. Aspen survival by site location in response to landscape fabric and <br />irrigation. Note Yoast 2a and 21h had the most competing vegetation biomass. <br />19 <br />