My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:06 PM
Creation date
1/6/2010 9:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
Aspen Study Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Appendix 22-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. A large portion of the Seneca mines was covered with aspen, serviceberry, and <br />other native plants prior to mining. Aspen is unique in that it is a common species in the <br />western United States, but it has not been planted successfully in wildland <br />environments. Developing methods to do so and gaining a better understanding of <br />factors that limit planting success of woody perennials in high - altitude semi -arid <br />environments will be of great benefit to the mining industry in the West and should aid <br />State regulatory authorities in permitting and enforcement of coal mine activities. <br />Aspen and serviceberry were planted using standard landscape fabric designed <br />for machine planting as recommend by the Colorado State Forest Nursery. This <br />experiment hand planted the trees and shrubs, using the same landscape fabric (6 ft <br />wide) and tree /shrub spacing (5 ft) as used with machine planting. This particular <br />experiment was hand planted since the study was too small to warrant the economics of <br />contracting for a planting machine, and students were available to assist with the <br />planting. However, the experiment was planted with the same type of techniques used <br />• in machine planting where trees and shrubs are planted followed by laying, slitting, and <br />pinning the fabric around and over the planted trees. <br />The experiment included a total of six plots, three at the Yoast Mine and three at <br />the IIW Mine. All of the plots were located within two fenced areas at each mine to <br />exclude elk, deer, and cattle browsing. At each mine, one of the fenced areas includes <br />one experimental plot and the other fenced area includes two experimental plots. <br />Aspen and serviceberry were planted with or without the landscape fabric. Rows with or <br />without landscape fabric were randomized within each plot (Figure 2). Water supply was <br />from a nearby potable water source to avoid salinity problems. One -half of the planted <br />aspen and serviceberry received water every other week by watering from a bulk <br />storage tank. The other half received no supplemental irrigation water. The single <br />fenced plot at the IIW mine was abandoned after grasshoppers defoliated all the plants <br />by the end of June 2008 (Figure 3) and data were not included in the first year growth <br />analysis. The plot was re- examined for survival in the spring of 2009 and confirmed that <br />few plants survived. <br />• <br />is$] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.