My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (40)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (40)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:24 PM
Creation date
12/30/2009 8:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/21/2009
Doc Name
QA Liner Recert- App.A, Phase IVc Cert. Doc.
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 2004 -12- 043 -2170 <br />material prior to pug milling and stockpiling. A stockpile of processed SLF material remaining from <br />the 2003 construction season was also consumed and placed during the course of construction of the <br />Phase We OSA. <br />Ames began placing SLF in the Phase We OSA in May 2004 and completed SLF placement in <br />September 2004. SLF was compacted to a minimum thickness of 12 inches by a smooth -drum <br />vibratory compactor. Golder observed SLF depth verification tests performed by Ames to confirm <br />appropriate fill depth. Any areas that were found to be deficient in thickness were reworked and <br />retested until the area met specifications. The SLF depth verification is discussed in Section 4.2.6.3. <br />SLF was moisture - conditioned and compacted as needed to meet project specifications. The <br />minimum SLF density was 95 percent of the maximum dry density at plus or minus 3 percent of <br />optimum for bentonite amended SLF and at 3 percent dry of optimum for non - amended SLF, as <br />determined by standard Proctor tests performed by Golder. Areas of the SLF that initially failed to <br />meet the density or moisture requirements were moisture - conditioned, if necessary, and re- compacted <br />to achieve the required compaction. <br />Prior to geomembrane deployment on the SLF, Ames proof - rolled, compacted, and hand- worked the <br />fill surface to be free of desiccation cracks and abrupt grade changes. Golder then inspected the <br />surface. Sharp or angular stones greater than 0.75 inches in diameter were removed from the finished <br />surface. Golder approved the fill surface prior to release to Poly -Flex. Poly -Flex provided formal <br />subgrade approval prior to geomembrane deployment. Poly- Flex's subgrade acceptance forms are <br />presented in Appendix G. <br />2.7 Ore Storage Area Composite Liner System <br />The composite liner system in the Ore Storage Area (OSA) includes the following, as detailed in IFC <br />Drawing 17: <br />Minimum of 12 inches of compacted SLF overlain by 80 -mil single -sided textured <br />Linear Low- Density Polyethylene ( LLDPE) geomembrane (textured side down). <br />Poly -Flex installed approximately 2,685,000 square feet of 80 -mil single -sided textured LLDPE <br />geomembrane in the OSA (cumulative area from deployment bgs). The 2,685,000 square foot area of <br />0 <br />L-waunOk$M�Cp,gweeIVC-tO M 12170.040&I MCertrnrvo+oe Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.