Laserfiche WebLink
Example: <br />I• <br />An example of C« owned water rights used as replacement water follows. The <br />specific example to be discussed is the F.oberts-Stucker Overland Ditch water <br />Replacement Plan. For a detailed description of the Overland Ditch mitigation <br />plan, please refer to the East Roatcap water Feplacement Plan in the Water <br />Replacement Appendix, Volume 5-A. <br />C•4vI could deliver best Feservoir water to both Oak Mesa Ditch and Roberts-Stucker <br />Ditch via >lain Roatcap Creek. If transportation improvements cannot offset los- <br />ses due to diversion around the permit area, test I~ servoir orater would be used <br />to supplement floras. Calculations have been canpleted by HydroD1rnamics of Derr <br />ver, Colorado, on the water available for augmentation purposes in West Reser- <br />voir. 'That information is contained on the CWI owned water rights for West P.oat <br />cap Drainage Basin in the C47I owned Water Rights Appendix, Volume 5-A. Those <br />calculations by HydroDynamics shwa that 23.63 acre feet are available. CWI does <br />not intend to obtain water rights necessary to augment all flows in the West <br />Roatcap Drainage Basin or any Lxsin. That is not required due to the other pro- <br />visions of the Water Replacement Plan. <br />As stated thra:ghout the ti•Iater I~placement Plan, CSvZ does not propose mining <br />under any stream channels in the initial permit term. During this time, addi- <br />tional informatiar may be gathered on subsidence-induced problems and their <br />effect on hydrology. the Water Replacement Plans are ecen to evaluation, <br />appraisal, and justified changes. CWT, through literature research, scientific <br />study, regular monitoring, and technical analysis, will constantly update these <br />water replacement plans with the current state of the art. <br />I • <br />