My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2009-12-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2018 12:31:01 PM
Creation date
12/21/2009 10:23:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/2/2009
Doc Name
HYDROLOGY DESCRIPTION
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.7 Hydrology Description
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
underburden is relatively small compared to the overburden. There may be some discharge from <br />the Dakota coal on the southern side of Tuttle Draw, but the overburden aquifer is the major source <br />of discharge (inflow) to the surface water baseflow (outflow) within the vicinity of New Horizon 1 and <br />new Horizon 2 mining areas. <br />In conclusion, the overburden aquifer is the primary source of discharge (inflow) which maintains <br />the surface water baseflow (outflow) of Turtle and Calamity Draws. The coal and underburden <br />aquifers discharge much less water than the overburden with most of that discharge being released <br />downstream of the lower surface water monitoring sites on Tuttle and Calamity Draws (SW N3 and <br />SW-N103), respectively. <br />Evapotranspiration. Evapotranspiration (ET) is a major component of discharge at the New <br />Horizon mining areas. To determine the amount of ET, the Baseline Vegetation Studies Area Map <br />(Map 2.04.10-1) was used. The total study area encompasses 618 acres in and adjacent to the <br />proposed New Horizon 2 Mine permit area. Of the total acreage included in the study area 13 <br />percent (83 acres) are swales (wet standing water with hydrophytic vegetation), 25.6 percent (159 <br />acres) is irrigated pasture, 21.6 percent (133 acres) is in hay production, 16.6 percent (102.4 acres) <br />is under annual crop production, 1.8 percent (11 acres) consists of orchards, 1.0 percent (6 acres) <br />consists of ponds and the remaining 20.4 percent (124 acres) is sagebrush grasslands, disturbed <br />areas, dwellings or roads. The percentages of each vegetation type are generally representative <br />of adjacent areas as well. Most of the ET or consumptive use rates used were taken from the Soil <br />Conservation Service (SCS) Colorado Irrigation Guide which is a field office technical guide. The <br />consumptive use rates used in the guide were calculated by a computer program that uses the <br />modified Blaney-Criddle method. In determining the ET rate for the study area it is assumed that <br />the irrigation practices evenly distribute sufficient amounts of water to fulfill the consumptive use <br />water demands required by each of the different vegetation types. <br />Based on the vegetation types and the estimated consumptive use rates, there are approximately <br />1,299 acre feet of water evapotranspi red within the study area. Evaporation from the pond was not <br />included in this total. Excess irrigation water flows overland and contributes to the streamflow of <br />Calamity and Tuttle Draws. The streamflow from Calamity and Tuttle Draws in turn contributes to <br />the flow of the San Miguel River two and one half miles downstream of mining and the proposed <br />mining disturbance. <br />2.04.7-16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.