My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981015 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981015
>
_INSPECTION - C1981015 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2020 10:40:19 AM
Creation date
12/18/2009 3:19:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
12/5/2009
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> This was a complete quarterly inspection of the reclaimed Fruita mine permit revocation site, <br /> conducted by Dan Mathews of the DRMS Grand Junction Field Office. Weather was clear and cold. <br /> A remedial reclamation project was performed at the site in early November, as a follow-up to work <br /> completed in the early spring of 2009. The Division's Inactive Mine Program (IMP) developed the <br /> work plan and bid documents for both projects, with input from Coal Regulatory Program staff. The <br /> work was completed by contractors, paid for by a combination of remaining forfeited bond funds and a <br /> grant from the OSM civil penalties fund. The November follow-up project was undertaken primarily to <br /> repair erosion caused by a significant flood event that occurred in August 2009, as well as to roughen <br /> and interseed a small area at the #2 Mine portal backfill, where herbaceous vegetation did not <br /> establish well from initial seeding in the 1990's. Small areas along the main riprapped channel and <br /> the equipment access route to the channel repair location were also roughened, seeded and mulched <br /> upon completion of work. Work on the main riprap channel and adjacent areas downstream of the toe <br /> of the Mine #1 outslope was performed with heavy equipment; other work was performed by hand to <br /> minimize disturbance to previously reclaimed areas. <br /> Signs and Markers <br /> The old gate with the DMG revoked permit I.D. sign has been removed from the site, and a new cable <br /> gate with combination lock has been erected by the landowner. <br /> Hydrologic Balance and Backfill & Grading <br /> Erosion damage from the August 2009 flood described in the previous DRMS report, was repaired by <br /> the IMP remedial project in November. The main channel below the #1 Bench outslope was re- <br /> shaped and riprapped. The primary tributary channel that ties into the main riprap channel below the <br /> steep #1 outslope was also re-shaped and rock checks were installed. <br /> Hand repairs including minor channel shaping and rock placement, including installation of small rock <br /> checks, was undertaken in several areas, including rills along the lower reclaimed #1 mine bench <br /> access road, locations in the vicinity of the #1 Mine portal backfill and along the steep segment of the <br /> main channel on the outslope, where rock had been scoured out in a few locations by flood flows. <br /> A 2 foot high berm was installed along the lowest part of the sediment pond embankment, using dry <br /> sediment from the sediment pond, which was largely silted in due to the August flood. The pond will <br /> no longer retain significant water or sediment. Based on vegetation cover data collected by the <br /> Division in 2005, demonstration was made that runoff retention in the sediment pond was no longer <br /> necessary, because sedimentation from the site would not exceed premine conditions. The open <br /> channel spillway which was enlarged and improved with additional riprap in the spring of 2009, <br /> functioned well during the August flood event. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.