My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-10_PERMIT FILE - C1991078
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1991078
>
2009-11-10_PERMIT FILE - C1991078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:53 PM
Creation date
12/18/2009 3:00:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/10/2009
Doc Name
Revegetation Evaluation - Oct 2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 05 Vegetation Information
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />r1 <br />U <br />• <br />2.0 SAMPLING METHODS <br />2.1 Sample Layout <br />The sample layout protocol for the revegetation evaluation is a procedure designed to better <br />account for the heterogeneous expression of multiple seedings within the various reclaimed areas while <br />precluding bias in the sample site selection process. By design, the procedure is initiated randomly, and <br />thereafter, samples are identified in a systematic manner, along grid coordinates spaced at fixed <br />intervals, e.g. 100 ft. (see Exhibit 1 and Map 1). In this manner, "representation" from across the entire <br />reclaimed area is "forced" rather than risking the chance that significant pockets (or seedings) are <br />entirely missed, or overemphasized as often occurs with simple random sampling. Sample site selection <br />within the reference areas occurred in a similar manner, although the grid distribution was visual and <br />dimensions were altered accordingly to accommodate the different polygon shapes and sizes. <br />The actual procedure for sample site location occurred as follows. First, a fixed point of reference <br />locatable from year to year was selected. Second, a systematic grid of appropriate dimensions (e.g., 100 <br />ft. X 100 ft.) was selected to provide approximately 20 coordinate intersections within the revegetated <br />area that could then be used for sample sites. Third, a scaled, computer generated representation of the <br />selected grid was overlain on a computer generated map of the area utilizing north -south and east -west <br />compass points which could be easily established in the field. Initial placement of the grid was controlled <br />by the fourth step, selection of a pair of random numbers (between 0 and 100) used to facilitate location <br />of the initial coordinate point from the fixed reference location. Fifth, using a hand held GPS all sample <br />points were located in the field and sampled. The location of all 2009 sampling sites for the reclaimed <br />and adjacent areas are indicated on Map 1. <br />Once a selected grid point was located in the field, ground cover sampling transects were always <br />oriented in the direction of the next site to be physically sampled to further limit any potential bias while <br />facilitating sampling efficiency. This orientation protocol follows that which is indicated on Exhibit 1. If <br />the boundary of an area was encountered before reaching the full length of a transect, the orientation of <br />the transect was turned 90 in the appropriate direction so the transect could be completed within the <br />target unit. In this manner, boundary samples were retained entirely within the target unit by "bouncing" <br />off the boundaries <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. <br />Page 2 Hamilton Mine - Revegetation Evaluation - 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.