2009-12-16_REVISION - C1981008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

¢W -?l?.n? w ra.S h,a? : Gvr'tZL-? .-- t r? T .moo., Ms ?'greived Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. Colorado Division of Reclamatio October 1, 2008 691 CR 233, Suite A-2 n' Mining, and Safety QCj 0.6?( Durango, Co. 81301 L?.. : o office RE: Technical Revision No Mintn? 58, Section 2.05.4(2 Reve lDiv)sIn or n and Sd i aafey fety , ? standard for Irrigated Pasture from a ) getation. Change the revegetation Mine, Permit C-81-008 standard to a reference area (CO-0000213). New Horizon Dear Marcia, Sandy, and the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety: We do not object to the revegetation standard for Itri ated Pasture from a standard to a reference The reference area, that th Purpose of this is and what Western Fuels is trying to do here.. but for irrigated pasture onlyare using to g bond release for irrigated pasture areas is acceptable According the cover amendment letter, all of Frank Morgans Property pe will be submitted wi is irrigated cropland(alfalfa anothe ), and second page of the revision, they are only changing the Irr tigated hin 30-45 Pasture days. success Accordin standargd to from the a numerical standard to reference area comparison. We do not objeeX, to; this at. this. time... ; -, .. We do, however have: many objections to the total content f.thus Ross Gubka, will be addressed in the next Pro-osal w14cb; for 4ag revision In order to g started on get some building blocks and get getting our property returned to us as good as ox better accept the TR-58.revision.for irri tlianit was, we are willing to but there is some on Patty Morgans and o only. h at have ?e we o not to lava, reference area for bond release, object to using a We want to again remind you that we are not accepting 31 usage We are going to stand behind the 1 share will do 2 acres hThl?s Seb on years y ars of personal experience along with many others' experience. Some of the Permit contained in this application was incorrect at the time it was .presented and accepted We were not aware of its contents upon signing a lease the "old" moment, therefore, we do not agree with most of statements. We will, however, wait to see the -FUTURE,, amendments and revisions that are suppose to be coming out and that are suppose to change some of those items that we are objecting to, according to Ross We do reserve the right to object to the content as a whole if for any reason the amendments or revisions are not accurate and we do not get our property back as good as it was and is. ,.Sometimes promises and statements are lost or misinterpreted at later. dates and what we were told-and expected are not necessarily.the_ outcoue.. We would like to see Western Fuels get bond release as, Soon Road. We believe this area has been ready, to go back to the farmer oreman a east side of 2700 understand why it should take. so long for bond release and hope to,have ours rety cars. e do urnedWto us as not