My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2009-12-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:45 PM
Creation date
12/17/2009 9:58:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
12/16/2009
Doc Name
Memo Regarding Review & comments
From
Janet Binns
To
Tom Kaldenbach
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO, TOM KAILDENBA <br />FROM: JANET BI <br />SUBJECT: PEABQDY S GE EK MINE APPLICATION; CROW LETTER DATED 8/31/2009 <br />DATE: 12/16/2009 <br />CC: DAN E ERNANDEZ <br />On August 31, 2009, the Division received a letter from The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) <br />regarding their review of the Peabody Sage Creek Mine (PSCM) application. This letter was forwarded to <br />me for my review on October 22, 2009. Please find my review of CDOW's comments along with concerns <br />that need to be addressed by the operator. <br />Seed mixes proposed by Peabody Sage Creek Coal Company (PSCCC) for reclaimed areas, 2.05.4-T1, <br />2.05.4-T2, topsoil stockpile stabilization 2.05.4-T3, and drill pad reclamation 2.05.4-T5, are the same as the <br />seed mixes previously approved in the Seneca II permit (C1980-005). The PSCM application proposes to <br />re-disturb reclaimed portions of the Seneca II Mine. The underground workings of the PSCM would <br />continue westwards from the facilities and portal area and undermine Routt County Road No. 27 (RCR27) <br />and lands west of RCR27. The current application proposes room and pillar development and portal <br />development only. No longwall mining is currently proposed, nor are any ventilation boreholes or other <br />surface disturbances proposed aside from the portal and facilities area disturbance. <br />Peabody personnel met with CDOW representatives on July 31, 2009. CDOW acknowledged that <br />ventilation shafts are not currently a part of this PSCM application, but the need for ventilation shafts is <br />anticipated as the mine progresses. The CDOW's comments regarding ventilation shaft construction <br />impacts are based upon this projection. The CDOW identified that mining under the Noftsteger and <br />Noftsteger Zeigler reservoirs on the Twentymile State Trust Lands may necessitate the need to drain these <br />two reservoirs. The CDOW stocks these reservoirs with trout. Hunting of big game (pronghorn and elk) <br />and game birds (Columbian sharp-tailed grouse) also occur on the state trust lands. Construction of <br />ventilation shafts and access roads potentially may impact these activities. The CDOW provided ten <br />requirements to activities associated with construction of surface disturbances associated with ventilation <br />shaft construction on the Twentymile and Grassy Creek State Trust Lands. Since ventilation shafts or <br />access roads are not currently proposed on state trust lands in this permit application, these requirements are <br />not germane to this permit application. At such time that surface disturbance is proposed on the state trust <br />lands, these mitigation measures will need to be followed by the operator. The mitigation measures required <br />by DOW for the State Trust lands are not adverse to the DRMS Rules and Regulations (Rule 4.18). <br />CDOW also provided comment regarding reclamation efforts. The first two comments, "on-non-croplands, <br />establish a uniform vegetative cover that reflects pre-disturbance or reference area forbs, shrubs, and <br />grasses." is in agreement with DRMS requirements of Rule 4.15.1(1), Sections 34-33-120(2)(c), and 34-33- <br />120(2)(s) of the Act. The third reclamation requirement identified by the CDOW is to "Census and assess
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.