Laserfiche WebLink
One additional concern we have noted regarding permanent roads, is that there is a short <br />segment of unnamed light use road within the disturbed area near the substation site. The road <br />extends along the ridgeline from the curve on LU-1 approximately 500 feet to the northwest, <br />where it ties into an existing ranch road outside of the disturbance boundary. The road is <br />included within the SL-2 release request area, but has not been proposed as a permanent road <br />within Permit Attachment 20-2 or depicted on permit Exhibit 20-2. <br />One option for addressing these concerns would be for SCC to submit a technical revision <br />application to incorporate the required information into the permit prior to SL-2 approval. <br />Required information would include appropriate final reclamation As Built documentation for <br />each of the light use roads and the "J" Road segment, as well as additional map and narrative <br />information and landowner retention request for the currently unnamed light use road that <br />branches off LU-1. The other option would be for the Division to proceed with SL-2 review and <br />proposed decision, with the road corridors in question to be excluded from the proposed <br />approval decision. My understanding from our conversation yesterday is that you would prefer <br />the latter option, rather than delaying SL-2 review to accommodate necessary revision <br />preparation and review. The necessary documentation would need to be incorporated into the <br />permit prior to any future Phase 1 bond release request that would include the subject road <br />corridors. Please confirm that this is the case, or let me know if you have further <br />comment or questions. <br />Please contact me if you have any questions. <br />Sincer ly, <br />Daniel athews <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />C: Denver File