My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2009 9:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
Mine Water Control Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 66 Mine Water Control Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine - Mine Water Control Plan Mountain Coal Company <br />• 3.3.5 Hydrograph Response Shape <br />Hydrograph response shapes reflect the speed at which water runs off a watershed, rated in <br />SEDCAD+ as fast, medium, or slow. A slow response shape would correspond to a forested <br />area or an area with a lot of obstructions, while a fast response shape would correspond to an <br />unvegetated or poorly protected area. Paved areas were assigned a "Fast' hydrograph <br />response shape. Other areas were assigned a "Medium" hydrograph response shape. <br />3.4 Subwatershed Sediment Parameters <br />SEDCAD+ utilizes the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, or RUSLE, to compute soil loss <br />from watersheds. RUSLE parameters, and their derivation, are explained below. <br />3.4.1 Soil Erodibility Factor, K <br />The erodibility factor of a soil refers to the susceptibility of soil particles to detachment and <br />transport by rainfall and runoff. Higher numbers indicate higher susceptibility to erosion. For <br />natural soil areas, the soil erodibility factor was obtained from the soil survey report, and <br />averaged in a similar fashion to the approach taken for Curve Numbers. Natural soil K-factors <br />varied from 0.19 to 0.37. Disturbed and revegetated areas were assigned a K of 0.30, while <br />paved and impermeable areas were assigned a K of 0.25. Coal product was assigned a K of <br />0.10, owing to its low runoff potential. In conjunction with the assigned C- and P-factors of 1.0, <br />the resulting K*C*P product for coal equals 0.10, yielding the same erosion potential as in <br />Greystone's 1994-1995 analysis of pond MB-3, which used a K of 2.0, and a CP of 0.05 for coal <br />product. Finally, subwatershed K-factors were computed as an area-weighted average in the <br />same fashion as Curare Numbers <br />• 3.4.2 Length-Slope Factor, LS <br />The length-slope factor, LS, is computed along a representative hillslope flow path and accounts <br />for the tendency of long, steep slopes to produce higher soil erosion rates than shorter, flatter <br />slopes. The representative flow length and slope were estimated from contour maps using <br />AutoCAD. From these, SEDCAD+ computes the LS factor. Note that the representative flow <br />length for an irregularly-shaped watershed is typically less than that of the time of concentration <br />path. <br />3.4.3 Control Practice Factor, CP <br />The RUSLE, as implemented in SEDCAD+, considers the sediment loss from an area with a <br />given cover and conservation practice, as compared to that of a field in continuous fallow <br />condition, by introduction of a Control Practice (CP) factor. The C factor accounts for the effects <br />of ground surface residue, canopy cover, and surface roughness. The P factor accounts for <br />sediment control practices such as contouring, buffer strips, and straw bales. Only the C factor <br />was adjusted for the West Elk site model. P was conservatively considered a constant 1.0. In <br />keeping with previous studies, the C-factor was set to 1.0 for coal pile (reflecting bare ground), <br />0.01 for impermeable and paved areas, and 0.05 for all other areas. The C = 0.05 value is <br />typical of both gravel-covered surfaces and grassed areas, and conservative for forested areas. <br />For simplicity, the subwatershed C factor was conservatively taken as the maximum of the <br />constituent area C-factors, rather than the weighted average. <br />• <br />Tetra Tech October2008
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.