My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:39 PM
Creation date
12/1/2009 10:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
Trapper G-Pit Landslide Mining Assesment, January 2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix T
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.lunucrry 15, 200 8 Page 5_5 <br />Soudn% Cst Northrs)st <br />r <br />i <br />IV:M <br />Figure 38, Schematic Example of Mining in Steeply Dipping Beds Locations of k-Pit <br />Outside the Landslide Area <br />material. Some material might be sufficiently loose in this area that a lower angled cut face <br />should be used (1.314:1 V). The decision to flatten the slope will be at the discretion of the TNII <br />engineers depending on local conditions. Blasting may be required for tight interburden belo\\ <br />the I.-Scam. <br />Once mining has progressed sufficiently eastward and spoils are being piled in previously <br />cut areas spoil, movement may be problematic in areas where the weak Q-Floor mudstones are <br />steeply dipping. There is potential fbr the spoils to 'creep' if saturated. The spoils should be <br />placed a sufficient distance from active mining to prevent spoil creep from interfering with <br />operations. Recommendations for spoil pile design were discussed in Section 4.4. <br />The lbllowing four types of monitoring are recommended for the K-Pit area: ( I ) large- <br />scale downdip hillside movement, (2) local cut-face slope movement, (3) bedding slip, and <br />(4) groundwater elevations. Global movement can be monitored near the bottom of the hillside <br />(K 18-K20) out of the way of mining operations. Survey benchmarks should be installed and <br />monitored in this location to collect data on the magnitude and direction of any large-scale <br />surface movements. Ifthe data indicate significant movement, additional benchmarks should be <br />installed. <br />Local instability of the cut face slope should be monitored for unstable loose blocks and <br />larger-scale face raveling. Because the cut-face will be excavated by dozer, the cut-face is <br />expected to be smooth with few visible blocks. The most effective monitoring of'such faces is <br />visual inspection of loose blocky areas. I Instable blocks should be taken down as needed. <br />Characterization borehole 07-GX6-CCR had inclinometer casing installed to provide <br />information on bedding slip. Borehole 07-GX5-CCR had three piezometers installed to monitor <br />groundwater elevations. <br />Agap ito Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.