My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:39 PM
Creation date
12/1/2009 10:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
Trapper G-Pit Landslide Mining Assesment, January 2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix T
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Januarv 15. 2008 Page 30 <br />5.0 GEOTECH\ICAL ISSUES FOR MINim. K-PIT AM) G-PIT <br />5.1 Failure llechanisms <br />There are two types of failure that have been observed in this area of the mine: local <br />highwall tailure and global slope failure. The highwall failure that occurred in G-Test pit in <br />2001 was a local failure initiated by unfavorable orientation ofthe geologic structures. A view <br />of that failure is shown in Figure 22. The bedding planes were dipping into the pit and sub- <br />vertical jointing in the sandstones were overturned. This structure was unfavorable for highwall <br />stability. <br />-71 <br />Via. ?. 7.1- • --? ` • ?i'i ,:. a ?„ <br />Ail <br />Air <br />Y ? <br />Figure 22. Highwall Stability Failure at G-Test Pit in 2001 <br />The failures that occurred in G-Strike Pit were a combination of local and global <br />instability. Aller the August 2004 failure. the highwall lost stability at the immediate lace. A <br />view of' that failure is shown in Figure 23. After the September 2005 highwall failure. the <br />mechanism controlling failure was thought related to global instability ofthe slope. Measurable <br />displacements were further f-orn the highwall face than expected. A view of that failure is shown <br />in Figure 24. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.