My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:39 PM
Creation date
12/1/2009 10:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
Trapper G-Pit Landslide Mining Assesment, January 2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix T
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Junucn,v 15, 2001' Page 29 <br />4, 2.5 Rounclarti• Conclition,s <br />The vertical boundaries of the model assumed zero-displacement condition simulating <br />symmetry to the west over the hill crest and to the east across the G-Strike spoils. The ground <br />surface was Iree to move as needed and the model base assumed a zero-displacement condition. <br />The initial vertical stresses were gravitational and horizontal stresses assumed lithostatic loading <br />proportional to vertical stresses for Poisson's effect 0''1 -0. <br />4.3 Analysis Sequence and Cases Analyzed <br />Four parameters were varied in assessing the overall spoil stability: slope angle, till <br />height, groundwater level, and the bedding plane strength ofthe Q-Floor mudstone layer. Cases <br />analyzed were based on the combination of these factors. Fill heights and groundwater <br />elevations were relative to the slope toe on the Q-Floor mudstone after mining. The assumed <br />geometry for this case is shown in Figure 17. <br /> <br />au,h%:uri I.,LIr <br />?:onuJ- <br />Po,1. <br />,,, H-4-i Nud.i„nr <br />Figure 17. FLAC Model Cross Section Simulation of G-Pit Spoil Pile with a Slope of <br />37.6" ( I . M:I V) Illustrating; Material Groups and Groundwater Table <br />Hour equilibrium states were computed l6r each spoil slope to determine the stability of <br />the slope for a given groundwater condition. First, the spoil pile was incrementally raised under <br />unsaturated conditions checking stability to obtain the maximum stable spoil height. Next, the <br />model was rerun but with groundwater introduced to examine the effect on stability. Residual <br />strength was then applied to the Q-Floor mudstone bedding plane to simulate long-term <br />conditions and the stability was checked. The final step was to estimate the salch factor of the <br />highest stable slope. <br />The factor ofsatety was estimated by comparing calibrated spoil strength to the strength <br />at the limit ofequilibrium. The limit of equilibrium was determined by gradually reducing the <br />spoil strength until the model did not come to an equilibrium state,. Failure state of the model <br />was assessed using several criteria (including maxinmlm out-of=balance force, maximum <br />velocity, shear strain increment, plastic indicators). The salety factor was computed using <br />Equation 8. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.