My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (38)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (38)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:40 PM
Creation date
11/24/2009 12:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
pages 4-222aa to 4-233r
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• permeability aquifers have exhibited limited drawdowns in the immediate vicinity of the active pits. <br />Further, drawdowns downgradient of the active mining areas typically recover much faster than <br />expected because the increased permeability, in the backfill 'spoil aquifer transmits water to the <br />downgradient end of the pit more readily. <br />Drawdowns at KLM well GP-2, roughly 2200 feet distant from the G Strike pit boxcut, have <br />developed on the order of twenty feet, within the approximate range of predicted behavior for <br />aquifers in the area. Well dewatering activities in the G Pit area will likely maintain this slight <br />drawdown until mining is completed in the area. Drawdown recorded at QR well GP-1, some 1200 <br />feet away from the boxcut, was observed at approximately 40 feet before GP-1 was disturbed by <br />mining in early 2003. <br />Wells GC-1 and GC-2, completed in the HI and 3rd White Sandstone aquifers respectively, showed <br />only slight declines in water level when A Pit mining occurred within 1,000 feet directly upgradient <br />from the wells during the early 2000's. Water levels in these wells have since recovered to <br />premining levels. <br />IMPACTS TO ADJUDICATED WELLS (see Map M31) <br />• The Second White sandstone does not exist in Derringer pit. In Ashmore pit, the Second White <br />Sandstone is probably not saturated in the areas of the pit that will be mined during the current <br />permit term. <br />The nearest Third White sandstone well to the Ashmore pit during the permit period is slightly greater <br />than one mile to the northeast. Significant drawdowns in the Third White sandstone to the north of <br />the mine are not expected because drainage of ground water to the north end of the mine due to <br />increased permeability in the backfill aquifer will likely cause water-level rises in the Third White <br />sandstone aquifer north of the mine. No impacts are expected in Third White sandstone wells 80998 <br />and W-624-74 during the current permit term. Wells 22653F, 22654F and 22100F are completed <br />below the Twentymile Sandstone and should not be impacted by the mine dewatering. <br />• <br />4-226d <br />Revision Pe <br />Approved:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.