My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (44)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (44)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:40 PM
Creation date
11/24/2009 12:55:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
Rangeland, Cropland, Wildlife Mitigation & Air Pollution Control Plan
From
pages 4-101 to 4-171
Section_Exhibit Name
4.4 through 4.7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 4.4.1.3 Shrub Density Standards <br />Revegetation standards for shrub reestablishment at Trapper Mine should not be established from direct <br />comparisons to reference areas or premining shrub densities. An analysis of stem density data in <br />Section 2.3.3.3 shows that the naturally occurring density of shrubby stems is prohibitive to use by <br />grazing ungulates. <br />In general terms, Young et al., (1967) found that forest density and understory vegetation influenced the <br />distribution of forage utilization in areas of study in northern Oregon. Clary el al. (1978) identified two <br />variables, perennial grass production and ponderosa pine stem density, as being primarily responsible for <br />the variation in the pounds of forage consumed by cattle. Cook (1966) investigated twenty-one separate <br />variables for the effect on utilization by cattle. He identified eleven variables as having a significant <br />effect on utilization with the density of brush being consistently in the top eight. Kufeld (1977) in his <br />study of oak stands found that dense stands will prevent access by cattle and elk and that production of <br />grasses and fores occurring under such stands may be suppressed. Investigations have shown that <br />cattle prefer to forage in open areas and will avoid areas where an overstory exists (Reynolds 1962; <br />McEwen and Dietz, 1965; George and Powell, 1979). <br />Boyd (1970) conducted an extensive study of elk of the White River Plateau. Included in his study were <br />the degree of utilization by elk of various densities of Gambel's oak. He concluded that elk use is <br />inhibited at densities of thiryfive percent and that elk are physically excluded on densities exceeding fifty- <br />10 one percent. Boyd also indicated that mature and aged stands generally have densities that exceed the <br />above value. In addition, overmature plants are of such height as to be out of reach to deer and elk, <br />even during winter months. <br />Density measurements by Boyd are essentially an indication of aerial cover. Section 2.3.1 discusses <br />cover measurements at Trapper Mine in relation to habitat descriptions. Tables 2.3-2 and 2.3-4 illustrate <br />in percent relative cover, shrub cover by species and cover by lifeform for the mountain shrub vegetative <br />types. <br />Jefferies (1965) conducted a study on Gambel's oak at the San Juan Basin Experiment Station. <br />Jefferies major conclusion was that by thinning oak brush stands, greater forage production could be <br />realized on oak dominated ranges. It was Jefferies opinion that lower production under oak was due to <br />the predominance of cool season species and the high degree of shading from the oak canopy. This is <br />corroborated by the work of Tiedeman and Schmutz (1966) who were able to increase grass production <br />by 770 Ibs per acre by destroying an oak canopy. Kufeld (1977) found that grasses increased in <br />abundance by forty-four percent after treating oak brush. Two years after a spraying treatment, he found <br />that elk use had increased by seventy-three percent and deer use was up sixteen percent. While deer <br />use seems less inhibited by high shrub density, Boyd (1970) found that when oak densities (of canopy <br />cover) above fifty-one percent were thinned, it did not adversely affect wintering deer herds. <br />• <br />4-112 <br />Revision: T/2-_4I <br />2/Approved: iVA3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.