My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (46)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-09-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (46)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:40 PM
Creation date
11/24/2009 12:53:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/21/2009
Doc Name
pgs 3-1 to 3-101
Section_Exhibit Name
3.0 Project Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the predominant drainage characteristics reconstructed. Thirteen of the seventeen drainageways <br />anticipated to be disturbed and/or reconstructed in this permit term drain a watershed of less than one <br />square mile above the uppermost sediment control pond in the drainage. All of the drainages impacted by <br />mining in this permit term are ephemeral. The eleven smaller watersheds are drained by West Pyeatt <br />(256 acres), Middle Pyeatt (411 acres), Grouse (177 acres), Sage (125 acres), Oak (313 acres), Ute (81 <br />acres), Deer (32 acres), West Flume (139 acres), Middle Flume (578 acres), East Middle Flume (133 <br />acres), East Flume (93 acres), Horse (285 acres), West Horse (248 acres) and Deal (176 acres). The <br />other watersheds are No Name (1,379 acres), Johnson (1,359 acres), and East Pyeatt (1,157 acres). <br />As is evident upon examination of the postmining profiles, mining and regrading operations through the <br />gulches will cause, or have caused them in most areas to be elevated as a result of overburden and <br />interburden swell not completely offset by the amount of coal recovered. The differences are caused by <br />drainage geometry and waste to coal ratios. An exception is the K pit area where some material will be <br />removed by a truck/excavator fleet and placed in permanent fill locations. In general terms, the <br />ephemeral drainageways will be re-established to functionally blend with the undisturbed drainageway <br />below the area to be backfilled and reclaimed. <br />The reestablished drainageways will have slopes that generally diminish in magnitude from the top to the <br />bottom approximating a parabolic curve. Also, the principal channel of a drainage will be constructed such <br />that the approximate drainage area which existed prior to mining for a particular drainage basin and its <br />associated principal channel will be established for the postmine drainage <br />3-03 <br />2 PZ10, <br />PRSO <br />R ( 21 1 O`ff.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.