My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-12_REVISION - M2005050
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2005050
>
2009-11-12_REVISION - M2005050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2009 1:15:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005050
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/12/2009
Doc Name
EPP initial review
From
DRMS
To
Gault Grou, Inc. & Rimrock Exploration & Development
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-S- <br />Section 2.0: "There are no known faults in the vicinity of the claims that might act as higher permeability zones <br />along which groundwater could concentrate and flow." <br />Comment: The geologic map provided in the report is generalized and, according to the legend, is based on a 1956 <br />photo geologic map. It appears from the Google Earth image that there may be more geologic structures near the <br />mine area than are depicted on the 1956 map, as shown by the rendering below. DRMS recommends more detailed <br />geologic mapping, or at the very least, hydrologic investigations to assess the hydraulic nature of the structures. <br />2.0: "The Brushy Basin 1mb is a regional contining unit....... <br />Comment: Please provide data or references that verify this statement. <br />3.0: PROPOSED DRILL. HOLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS <br />Comment: Since this is a DMO, drill holes planned for the collection of hydrologic information should be of sufficient <br />depth to intercept and characterize all water bearing formations that have any chance of being impacted by site <br />operations or reclamation activity, regardless of the formation depth. <br />3.0: The plan does not appear to include a down gradient point of compliance well, nor- a discrete up gradient <br />baseline well. <br />Comment: Points of compliance are required by Rule 3.1.7(6). One or more up gradient baseline wells will be useful <br />to the Operator in assessing impacts to ground water from mining activities. <br />61: "The waste rock pile(s) du riot exhibit any DMO defined criteria." <br />Comment: The waste rock piles contain toxic-forming materials and therefore require special handling and <br />management.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.