My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-19_REPORT - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2009-11-19_REPORT - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:07 PM
Creation date
11/20/2009 11:13:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
11/19/2009
Doc Name
2008 AHR 2nd Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Oxbow Mining, LLC
Annual Report Year
2008
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313ISherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />l <br />November 19, 2009 <br />James A. Kiger <br />Environmental Manager <br />Oxbow Mining, LLC <br />P.O. Box 535 <br />Somerset, Colorado 81434 <br />RE: Elk Creek Mine, Permit No. C -1981 -022, Oxbow Mining LLC <br />2008 Annual Hydrology Report, Second Adequacy Review <br />Mr. Kiger: <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />- Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has finished its review of <br />)ow's responses, dated November 6, 2009, to the Division's adequacy response letter dated October <br />2009. All issues have been resolved. <br />1. The hydrologic data sheet for surface water monitoring site E -2 does not show any full suite <br />laboratory data for 2008, even though the hydrologic monitoring schedule on page 5 of the <br />2008 AHR shows that a full suite analysis is required for the 2nd and 3r quarters, if a sample is <br />available. Please explain. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The November 6, 2009 submittal contained the revised <br />pages for insertion into the 2008 AHR. No exceedances were noted in the 2008 data. <br />The hydrologic data sheet for surface water monitoring site NF -1 does not show any 4 th quarter <br />2008 data for a full suite analysis, as required by the hydrologic monitoring schedule on page <br />5 of the 2008 AHR. Please explain this omission. <br />The Division has no further concerns. In the November 6, 2009 submittal, Oxbow stated that <br />field parameters were sampled for the 4 th quarter 2008 but laboratory samples were not run for <br />the same quarter. However, this problem was rectified for the 4 th quarter of 2009. <br />3 The hydrologic data sheet for ground water monitoring site EC -14, listed as E -14 on the data <br />sheet, does not show any 3 rd quarter full suite analysis for 2008, even though this is required by <br />the hydrologic monitoring schedule shown on page 5 of the 2008 AHR. Please explain this <br />omission. <br />I <br />'Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.