My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-16_INSPECTION - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2009-11-16_INSPECTION - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2009 10:22:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
11/16/2009
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
CC&V
Inspection Date
11/13/2009
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: _m-19$Q_9dd <br />INSPECTION DATE: 11/9 P. i.-? (19 INSPECTORS INITIALS: -BK_ <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a liner deployment inspection of the site on 11/9 and 11/13 09. As <br />required by the MLRD Board and DBMS, all liner deployment had to be observed by DRMS.CC&V <br />had planned to remove the drain cover and old liner that was not certified where the old <br />LOB used to be while the weather cooperated. The old LOB was demolished three weeks ago, <br />CC&V had planned these minor area deployment and the other small area along the east side <br />of the old LOB area that is going to be tied in to the Phase V leach pad area. <br />DRMS observed the removal of the drain cover, geommebarne liner and testing of the <br />compaction of the underlying clay. <br />AMEC, QA/QC personnel were on site observing each phase of these critical deployments and <br />verified the proper installation of the liner. The deployed liner was walked and <br />inspected and found to be in good repair. <br />while on site collected the following readings from the Phase I,II,III and IV High and <br />Low Volume solution collection transducers. <br />Phase I High Volume solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded at 44.5 # 2 was at <br />44.3 and $3 was at 44.2. Piezometer for the pond was at 62.4 feet. <br />Low volume transducer # 1 was at .44 and $2 was at .43 <br />Phase II High Volume Solution Collection transducer # 4 was recorded at 45.8 , # 5 was at <br />41.4 and $ 6 was at 45.4 Piezometer for the pond was recorded at 46.9. Low volume <br />solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded at .28 and # 2 was at .47 <br />Phase IV High Volume Solution Collection transducer # 7 was recorded at 52.4 # 8 was at <br />51.1 ( was at 52.3 and # 10 was at 52.8. Low Volume # 1 was at 15.1 and # 2 was at 10.0 <br />inches of hydrostatic head. All preg pond volumes were with 20% of the 80% operational <br />level. Both Mr. Comer and Mr. Riley were notified and both assured the Division that CC&V <br />was in the process of lowering the volumes . During the winter months DRMS would like to <br />see these pond levels lower and at least one of the preg. ponds to have enough storage <br />capacity in the event of unforeseen problems, such as a header pipe failure. Both agreed <br />that is also their wish, but because over 1.1 million tons of new ore was not stockpiled, <br />which decreased the moisture being held by the ore. Be that as it may, CC&V must make <br />sure even though the levels are below the 800 operational volumes for all three ponds, <br />especially during the winter months, DRMS would like to see at least one of the per-ponds <br />much lower than where it was observed. <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME: MR. TIM COMER <br />OPERATOR: CC&V <br />STREET: P_0 ROX 191 <br />cc: I' CE <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP: VICTOR. CQI ORADD 80860 <br />F BL
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.