Laserfiche WebLink
Curve Number. CN <br />Curve numbers (CN) were approximated based on hydrologic soil type, as well as type and amount • <br />of ground cover. Curve numbers were obtained from Technical Release No. 55 (Soil Conservation <br />Service [SCS], 1986). SCC used the following curve number> for the following land use <br />i <br />conditions in hydrologic demonstrations at the Seneca H Mine. <br />I <br />Disturbed i <br />Soil Type: B <br />Ground Cover Type: Newly graded <br />Ground Cover: Bare <br />CN: 86 <br />Undisturbed <br />Soil Type: C <br />Ground Cover Type: Sagebrush <br />Ground Cover: Fair <br />CN: 63 <br />Undisturbed <br />Soil Type: D <br />Ground Cover Type: Sagebrush <br />Ground Cover: Fair <br />CN: 70 <br />Reclaimed <br />Soil Type: B <br />Ground Cover Type: Herbaceous <br />Ground Cover: Good <br />CN: 62 <br />The original postmine channel design modeling was completed in' 1986. Since that time the <br />graded spoil areas have been successfully revegetated. The rou{;h, undulating land surface, <br />typical of backfilled areas, is conducive to high infiltration, which combined with the <br />successful revegetation, limits the surface run-off from contributing watershed areas and <br />supports selection of lower curve number values. Consequently, alcurve number value of 86 is <br />no longer appropriate for hydrologic modeling at the Seneca H Mine. <br />The hydrologic modeling for Post Mine Channel SIIPM-1 (lower) was revised for TR-36. SCC <br />used a curve number value of 62 for the contributing watershed areas that have been <br />successfully revegetated. Hydrologic modeling demonstrations subsequent to TR-36 have also <br />used a curve number value of 62 far reclaimed and revegetated arias, except in instances were <br />the watershed has been re-disturbed. • <br />TR-41 7-12-4 Revised 04/07 <br />